Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Estimation of Profit After Rejection of Books Must Follow Past History — Arbitrary 8% NP Rate on Contract Receipts Rejected by ITAT Allahabad in DCIT vs. Shri Shakeel Haider, Amethi (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 445
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a civil contractor engaged in road construction work for NHAI and other authorities, filed returns for AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 declaring income from contract receipts. During assessment p...

Revised Return Filed to Correct Accountant’s Error Requires Examination of Books — ITAT Allahabad Orders De Novo Assessment in Ayush Jaiswal vs. NFAC (ITA No.20/ALLD/2024, AY 2020-21)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 340
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee initially filed a return declaring income of ₹14,49,900 and subsequently filed a revised return declaring ₹6,17,900. The case was selected for scrutiny due to the significant reduction...

Old Trade Creditors Cannot Be Treated as Bogus & DVO Report Not Binding Without Considering Objections — ITAT Allahabad Grants Partial Relief in M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar vs. JCIT Central Circle, Allahabad (ITA Nos. 80, 89–93/ALLD/2023, AYs 2004-05 to 2009-10)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 339
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search under section 132 was conducted on the assessee’s premises on 27.08.2009, followed by assessments under section 153A. Additions were made on two principal issues: Alleged bogus sundr...

Demonetization Cash Deposits May Be Business Receipts — ITAT Allahabad Remands for Verification; Section 44AD May Apply in Aulad Husain vs. CIT(A), Delhi (ITA No.39/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 404
Read More »
Facts of the CaseUnder Operation “Clean Money,” the Department identified persons who had deposited substantial cash during the demonetization period but had not filed returns. The assessee had deposited ₹14,90,9...

Delay Due to Counsel’s Negligence Should Not Defeat Substantive Justice — ITAT Allahabad Restores Salary Case for Statutory Deductions in Anurag Jaiswal vs. ITO-2(1), Allahabad (ITA No.77/ALLD/2024, AY 2020-21)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 314
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a medical professional employed at King George’s Medical University, originally filed a return declaring income of ₹9,48,020 and claiming refund of excess TDS. Subsequently, on advice...

No Addition for Alleged Suppressed Production Without Rejection of Books or Evidence of Unaccounted Sales — ITAT Allahabad Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal in DCIT/ACIT Central Circle vs. M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 309
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) deleting additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged suppression of production for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13.The Asse...

Additions for Alleged Suppressed Production Unsustainable Without Concrete Evidence — ITAT Allahabad Upholds Deletion in ACIT/DCIT Central Circle, Allahabad vs. M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 343
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals challenging the orders of the CIT(A) which had deleted substantial additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged suppression of production in the assessee’s ...

Cash Deposits from Presumptive Business Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained When Similar Income Accepted in Earlier Years — ITAT Allahabad Applies Consistency Principle in Amit Chopra vs. ITO-1(1), Allahabad (ITA No.34/ALLD/2024, AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 538
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBased on AIR information, the Department found that the assessee had deposited ₹35,17,115 in a savings bank account but had not originally filed a return of income for the relevant year. Reassessment...

Ex-Parte Dismissal by NFAC Without Considering Physical Submissions & Remand Report Violates Natural Justice — ITAT Allahabad Restores Appeal in Rohit vs. ITO, Ambedkar Nagar (ITA No.102/ALLD/2024, AY 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 330
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A), NFAC, which had arisen from a best-judgment assessment under section 144. The appeal before the Tribunal itself was delayed by 692 days. The...

Bank Account Linked to PAN but Belonging to Proprietorship of Father — Additions for Cash Deposits Set Aside for Verification: ITAT Allahabad in Rahul Sharma vs. ITO Ward-3(2), Mirzapur (ITA No.98/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 309
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee did not file a return for the relevant year. Information was received regarding substantial deposits in a current bank account maintained with Punjab National Bank in the name of “Sri Ra...