Commissioner of Income Tax vs Betterways Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd. | Additional Evidence under Rule 46A and Validity of Contract Novation under Section 62 of the Contract Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the CaseFor Assessment Year 2001-02, Betterways Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd. filed its return declaring income of ₹3,67,26,812.The assessee had obtained loans of ₹4 crores from Enam Securities Pvt. Ltd....

Mohan Meakin Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi [2011] 2011:DHC:2640-DB (Delhi High Court) – Business Loss on Irrecoverable Trade Advances Allowable as Deduction under Sections 28 and 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 21
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mohan Meakin Limited, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of liquor, beer, juices, canned products and glass bottles. During Assessment Year 1986-87, the assessee claimed deduction o...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s S.T. Micro Electronics Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court Upholds Deduction of MBO Incentive, PF Contribution Paid Within Grace Period & Expense Allocation Methodology [ITA No. 928/2010]

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s S.T. Micro Electronics Pvt. Ltd., operated two divisions: A 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) at NOIDA engaged in export of software. A Sales and Marketing (S&M) Divi...

Sh. Dinesh Kumar Goel v. Commissioner of Income Tax – Allowability of Genuine Business Expenditure Claimed Through Revised Return Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Bills Were Not Ledgerized | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 21
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his original return for Assessment Year 1997-98 declaring taxable income and claiming deduction of advertisement expenditure.Subsequently, a search under Section 132(1) of the Inco...

Director of Income Tax vs. M/s. Jacabs Civil Incorporated (and M/s. Mitsubishi Corporation): Section 234B Interest Deleted for Non-Resident Assessees as Tax is Fully Deductible at Source; Section 234D Interest Prohibited Retrospectively

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 24
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of tax appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a series of concurrent orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted i...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ram Kishan Dass & Connected Matters – Limitation for Completion of Assessment under Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Following CIT v. Bishan Saroop Ram Kishan Agro Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed multiple appeals against the orders passed in favour of the assessees, namely Ram Kishan Dass and Sunder Exports. The principal issue involved the validity and li...

CIT v. Assessee (ITA No. 541/2010) – Delhi High Court | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied on Bona Fide Claims Relating to Royalty, Sales Tax Interest and Additional Sales Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings after making additions/disallowances on the following grounds:1. Royalty Payment DisallowanceThe assessee had claimed deduction of royalty expendit...

M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | AY 1982-83 | Section 40(c), Section 41(1) & Business Expenditure Disallowance

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present reference before the Delhi High Court arose from Assessment Year 1982-83 involving M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. and the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ankitech Pvt. Ltd. & Others (Delhi High Court) – Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e) Taxable Only in Hands of Shareholder and Not Concern Receiving Loan

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees in the batch of appeals had received loans, advances, or book-entry credits from closely held companies. The common feature in all cases was that certain individuals who held substantial ...

M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Disallowance under Section 40C and Related Income Tax Deductions

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd., claimed various deductions and expenditures in its return for the Assessment Year 1982-83.The disputes pertained to: Disallowance of Rs. 3,65,000/- under ...