B. M. Gupta vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Scope of Rectification under Section 154: Whether Debatable Issues Can Be Corrected as “Mistake Apparent from Record”

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 365
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer passed a rectification order under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act purportedly to correct an error in the assessment. The rectification resulted in modification of the assessee...

Dileep Kumar Khaitan vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Scrutiny Assessment under Section 143(3): Additions Based on Unsubstantiated Transactions, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment year. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined financia...

Bhagwan Theatre vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Scrutiny Assessment under Section 143(3): Additions on Business Receipts and Evidentiary Burden, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in the business of operating a cinema theatre, was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment years. During assessment...

Patit Pawani Tara Tapo Sadhana Samiti vs CIT(E) — ITAT Allahabad Remands Rejection of Section 80G Approval for Fresh Examination under Rule 11AA, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee-society applied for approval under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to enable donors to claim deduction for donations. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) rejected the applic...

Sujit Majumdar vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Taxability of Long-Term Capital Gain from Property Sale and Allowability of Conversion Charges under Section 48, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, sold his share in an immovable property and declared the resultant long-term capital gain. During scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), the Assessing Officer computed ...

Kalyan Singh vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Prosecution under Rule 24 & Restoration Principles, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 105
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal challenging the order passed by the lower appellate authority. During the course of proceedings before the Tribunal, the assessee ...

Mohit Anand vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits under Section 69A, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 112
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed substantial cash deposits in the bank account of the assessee. The assessee was required to explain the source of such deposits. Not being ...

Uma Kesharwani vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside Ex-Parte Appellate Order for Non-Prosecution; Mandatory Speaking Order under Section 250(6), Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 114
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was originally assessed under the scrutiny provisions of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment year. Subsequently, reassessment proceedings were initiated on the ground that incom...

ITAT Allahabad: Seized Cash Must Be Adjusted Against Tax Liability — Interest u/s 234B Not Leviable Beyond Return Filing Date | Suresh Chandra Purwar (HUF) v. ACIT (AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSearch and seizure operations under Section 132 were conducted on the Purwar group on 25 February 2011, during which substantial cash amounting to approximately ₹4.73 crore was seized. The assessee...

ITAT Allahabad: Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn After Opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 — Shri Dinesh Kumar Pahuja v. ACIT (ITA No. 50/ALLD/2020, AY 2012-13) | Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 169
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 2 December 2019 for Assessment Year 2012-13. During the p...