Bogus Purchases Cannot Be Fully Disallowed Where Corresponding Sales Exist—Only Embedded Profit Taxable: ITAT Mumbai in S R Jewels v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the diamond trade, filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2009–10, whereby an addition of ₹49,21,400 was sustained ...

Registration under Section 12AB Cannot Be Rejected for Mere Technical Error: ITAT Mumbai in Ruah Community Foundation v. CIT (Exemptions)

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 93
Read More »
The assessee, a charitable trust, preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai, whereby its application seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax ...

Working Capital Adjustment Mandatory Where Directed by Tribunal—TP Adjustment Deleted: ITAT Mumbai in Red Hat India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 82
Read More »
The assessee, Red Hat India Private Limited, preferred an appeal against the order giving effect dated 31 December 2024 passed under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year...

Section 153D Approval Must Be Year-Wise: ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessments in Honey Arora vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
In Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25 v. Honey Arora (ITAT Delhi, order dated 09 January 2026), the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of assessments framed und...

Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed for Non-Prosecution—Bogus Loss Allegation on Client Code Modification Remanded: ITAT Mumbai in Ramkumar Venugopal Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
The assessee company preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai, for Assessment Year 2009–10. At the outset, the Tribunal noted a delay of 60 days in filing t...

Mechanical Approval under Section 153D Invalidates Search Assessment: ITAT Delhi in Avtar Singh Kochar Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
In Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25 v. Avtar Singh Kochar (ITAT Delhi, order dated 09 January 2026), the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal adjudicated cross-appeals arising from an...

Capital Asset Held Since Construction of Building Is Long-Term—Section 54 Exemption Allowable: ITAT Mumbai in Rajani Shivaji Ghadge v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
The assessee preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2016–17. The reassessment was completed under section 147 r...

Addition under Section 153C Unsustainable for Wrong Assessment Year: ITAT Delhi in Faridabad Presswell Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
In Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25 v. Faridabad Presswell Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi, pronounced on 09 January 2026), the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s a...

Addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Not Sustainable Where Stamp Duty Variation Is Within Tolerance Limit: ITAT Mumbai in Nilesh Pravinchandra Doshi v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
The assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2017–18 declaring total income of ₹14,45,090/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened under section 147 on the basis of information r...

Reopening under Section 147 Invalid Where Issue Was Examined in Original Assessment: ITAT Mumbai in Narendra Sevantilal Parikh (HUF) v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family, preferred an appeal against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2014-15, whereby the addition made in reassessment proceedings under sect...