Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Pradeep Verma vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment under Sections 148A(b) & 148A(d) set aside for fresh consideration due to incomplete evidence evaluation

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 171
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioner filed an income tax return declaring income of Rs. 3,16,540/- for AY 2014-15. The Revenue alleged that the petitioner purchased immovable property worth Rs. ...

Rohit Kapur vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, New Delhi & Anr. | Section 270AA Immunity Rejection Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice (Delhi High Court 2023:DHC:1970-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rohit Kapur, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2020–2021 declaring a total income of ₹1,73,72,262. The return was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3) of the Inc...

Rohit Kapur vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, New Delhi & Anr. | Section 270AA Immunity Rejection Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice (Delhi High Court 2023:DHC:1970-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Rohit Kapur, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2020–2021 declaring a total income of ₹1,73,72,262. The return was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3) of the...

Rohit Kapur vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, New Delhi & Anr. | Section 270AA Immunity Rejection Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice (Delhi High Court 2023:DHC:1970-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rohit Kapur, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2020–2021 declaring a total income of ₹1,73,72,262. The return was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3) of the Inc...

Milestone Systems A/S vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 197, 195 & Royalty on Software Payments | 2023:DHC:1926-DB

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a non-resident company incorporated in Denmark, is engaged in providing IP video management software and surveillance-related products globally. It entered into Distributor Partne...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi vs Springer India Pvt. Ltd. (2023) – Delhi High Court | APA Applicability in Transfer Pricing for Pre-APA Years

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning AY 2012–13. The Tribunal had passed the impugned order pursuant to remand directions issu...

World Wide Metals Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Ward 27(1), Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Section 148 & 148A – Minimum 7 Days Mandatory Response Time

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 154
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the validity of: Notice issued under Section 148A(b) dated 22.03.2022 Order passed under Section 148A(d) Reassessment proceedings initiated under...

Lotus Law Partners LLP (Through Legal Heir) vs Income Tax Officer Ward 54(4) Delhi | Delhi High Court | Section 148A & 148 Income Tax Act – Reassessment on Dissolved Entity Invalid

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 14.03.2022 issued under Section 148A(b), the order dated 31.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d), and the consequential notice issued un...

Preet Singh vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 32(1) & Anr. – Delhi High Court | Section 2(14)(iii), 54B & 54F | Agricultural Land Not a Capital Asset | ITA 106/2023

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 170
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant/assessee, Preet Singh, filed an appeal against the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Year 2013–2014. The Tribunal had dis...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi vs Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd. – Invalid Assessment Order for Non-Generation of DIN under CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 (Sections 147, 143(3), 144C, 292B, 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 205
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order dated 16.09.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Year 2011–12.The Assessing Officer passed the final ...