Addition under Section 68 Deleted Where Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness Proved Despite Non-Appearance of Share Subscribers: Happy Homes & Houses Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 26.09.2012 declaring total income of ₹1,120. The case was selected for scrutiny on account of large share premium received. Duri...

Reassessment Quashed Beyond Four Years for Borrowed Satisfaction and Non-Speaking Disposal of Objections: Shree Krishna Gyanodaya Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 153
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 on 30.09.2011 declaring nil income. The assessment was completed under Sections 153A read with 143(3) on 27.03.2014 at nil income. S...

Reassessment Quashed for Borrowed Satisfaction and Bar of Limitation: DCIT vs. Vedanta Resources Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 153
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Vedanta Resources Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 08.08.2016 declaring total income of ₹6,100. A survey under Section 133A was earlier conduct...

Revenue Appeal Dismissed on Multiple Issues Including Section 14A, Capital vs Revenue Expenditure and Transfer Pricing Adjustments: DCIT vs. Eureka Forbes Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata for Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 in the case of Eureka Forbes L...

Addition under Section 68 on Share Capital Deleted for AY 2012-13: No Requirement to Explain Source of Source Prior to Proviso – Exotica Enclave Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Exotica Enclave Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in the business of real estate. It filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 24.12.2012 declaring total in...

Reassessment under Section 147 Quashed Where Action Should Have Been Taken under Section 153C: DCIT vs. Suresh Kumar Banthia (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s original assessment for Assessment Year 2016-17 was completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A on 31.12.2018. A search under Section 132 was conducted on 30.11.2018 in the c...

Exemption under Section 54F Allowed Despite Prior Construction and Joint Ownership: Sale of Shares and Investment in Residential House – Saroj Goenka vs. ITO, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 200
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed her return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 declaring total income of ₹1,87,69,130. During the year, she sold 36,00,000 shares of Emami Ltd. on 13.07.2020 for a total conside...

Rental Income Taxable as Income from House Property and Jurisdictional Objection Rejected under Section 124: Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 declaring a loss of ₹1,46,903. During the relevant year, the assessee earned rental income of ₹9,48...

Addition under Section 56(2)(x) Deleted in Tax-Neutral Demerger: Compliance with Section 2(19AA) and Section 47(vib) Upheld – ACIT vs. Emami Realty Limited (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Emami Realty Limited, is a listed company engaged in real estate development. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement approved by the NCLT, the real estate undertaking of Oriental Sales Age...

Reopening under Section 148 after Search Upheld and Addition Restricted to Gross Profit on Undisclosed Purchases: Shakambhari Ispat & Power Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Shakambhari Ispat & Power Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 declaring total income of ₹17,25,39,330 under normal provisions and ₹51,82,85,619 under ...