Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–2 vs MOL Corporation (Delhi High Court) – Remand Order, Royalty on Software & Infructuous Appeal under Indo-US DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the Case The present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the remand order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT had restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh ad...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs Microsoft Corporation (Delhi High Court) – Software Licensing Not Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) | Section 260A Appeal Dismissed

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 169
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A challenging the ITAT order dated 13 May 2019. The dispute pertained to whether the income earned by Microsoft Corporation from licensing of software in Ind...

Kapoor Industries Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors (2022) – Reassessment Notice Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice under Section 148 Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 124
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kapoor Industries Limited, filed writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148 for Assessment Years 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18, ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs MOL Corporation | Delhi High Court | Royalty Taxability & ITAT Remand Infructuous | ITA 419/2019

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 301
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), wherein the Tribunal had remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fres...

Kapoor Industries Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Reassessment Invalid Due to Violation of Natural Justice under Sections 147 & 148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 319
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kapoor Industries Limited, filed writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148 for Assessment Years 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18, a...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi–07 vs. Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India) | Section 40(a)(ia) & Section 14A r/w Rule 8D | Delhi High Court (2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 128
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent/Assessee, Punjab National Bank (erstwhile United Bank of India), filed its return of income for AY 2010–11 under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was selected for ...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi–07 vs. Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India) | Section 40(a)(ia) & Section 14A r/w Rule 8D | Delhi High Court (2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent/Assessee, Punjab National Bank (erstwhile United Bank of India), filed its return of income for AY 2010–11 under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was selected for ...

GE Energy Parts Inc. & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Section 197 TDS Withholding Rate & Permanent Establishment Attribution

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petitions were filed by the petitioners challenging the orders dated 23.09.2021 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to Financia...

Kshipra Jatana vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 63(1) & Ors. (2022:DHC:1997-DB) – Refund of Excess Tax Recovery Beyond 10% Without Section 245 Notice Held Illegal

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 173
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed seeking refund of ₹1,52,240/- which had been recovered in excess of 10% of the total disputed tax demand for Assessment Year 2017–18 by adjusting refunds due fo...

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax Circle 3-1-1) & Ors. | Delhi High Court | AY 2018-19 Refund & TDS Credit Rectification Case

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 118
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner filed its return of income for AY 2018–19. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. No scrutiny assessment was conducted for the re...