Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

M/s Toshiba Corporation vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Intl. Tax) – Delhi High Court on Stay of Tax Demand & 20% Pre-deposit Rule [Sections 201(1), 201(1A), 220(6), 156 Income Tax Act]

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Toshiba Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging multiple orders directing it to deposit 20% of the outstanding tax demand. The dispute arose from an order dated 12 November ...

Aditi Infrabuild and Services Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(2) & Anr. (2022) – Refund of Excess Tax Recovery Beyond 20% Disputed Demand under Section 220(6) & Section 245 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner sought refund of ₹1,83,91,108/-, which was recovered in excess of 20% of disputed tax demand for AY 2016-17. The excess recovery was made by adjusting refunds of ...

Tata Teleservices Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 & Anr (2022:DHC:1044-DB) – Stay on Tax Demand Not Mandatory at 20% Under Section 201(1)/201(1A) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Tata Teleservices Limited, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 28 February 2022 and 14 March 2022, whereby its stay application was disposed of by the tax authorities.The di...

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (International Tax Circle 3(1)(1), Delhi) & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Refund of TDS Credit & Interest | AY 2009-13

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Qualcomm Incorporated, filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions against the Income Tax Department for failure to process income tax returns correctly and grant refunds along wit...

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAX), DELHI & ORS. (2022:DHC:344-DB) (Delhi High Court | W.P.(C) 1666/2022 & Connected Matters | Decided on 28 January 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  1 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Qualcomm Incorporated, filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions against the Income Tax Department for failure to process income tax returns, grant correct computation, and issue...

Updesh Kapur vs Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. – Condonation of Delay in Filing ITR and Scope of Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, an NRI residing in the UK, received compensation on account of the accidental death of his wife during the Financial Year 2017–18. The compensation included interest, on which TDS was...

Dr. Priya Narula vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Taxation 2(2)(2) & Ors. (2022:DHC:441-DB) – Refund of Excess Tax Recovery Beyond 20% Under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 160
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Dr. Priya Narula, filed a writ petition seeking refund of ₹2,87,520/- which had been recovered by the Income Tax Department in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demand for Assessment ...

Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Section 148 Income Tax Act vis-à-vis IBC Resolution Plan

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 132
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2014–15. The petitioner, being a corporat...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3, Delhi vs Alchemist Life Sciences Ltd (Delhi High Court) – No Addition under Section 153A Without Incriminating Material in Non-Abated Assessments (2022:DHC:444-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 12 July 2021. The ITAT had dismissed the Revenue’s appeals concerning assessment ye...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3, Delhi vs Alchemist Life Sciences Ltd (Delhi High Court) – Section 153A Additions Without Incriminating Material Not Sustainable (2022:DHC:444-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 12 July 2021. ITAT had dismissed the Revenue’s appeals relating to Assessment Years...