Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Deleted Due to Defective and Vague Penalty Notice Without Specifying Correct Limb Despite AMT Assessment under Section 115JC: ITAT Rajkot in Klin Industries vs. ACIT

Author
CA. Vivek kr. Jain
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 118
Read More »
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL-RAJKOTITA No.857/RJT/2025 Klin Industries Saandha-Appellant. VersusAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax-RespondentCoram: ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, J.Dated: 15/01/2026Decis...

Rectification under Section 154 Cannot Survive Once Quantum Addition Is Deleted: DCIT vs. Srishti Associates (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Srishti Associates, was subjected to assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2018-19 pursuant to a search and seizure operation under Section 132 conducted on the Resonance Group, Kot...

Appeal against Section 263 Revision Dismissed as Infructuous After Complete Relief in Consequential Assessment: Amar Partap Steels Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT-2, Jaipur (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Amar Partap Steels Private Limited, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Jaipur u...

Application for Registration under Section 12A Restored Where Rejection Was Based on Non-Compliance and Subsequent Registration under RPT Act: Neem Ka Thana Education Society vs. CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Neem Ka Thana Education Society, filed an application under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv)(B) in Form No. 10AB seeking registration as a charitable institution. The application was rejected by th...

Agricultural Income Disallowance Remanded for Fresh Verification Where Evidence Was Not Placed on Record: Deepak Vegpro (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Deepak Vegpro (P) Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2022-23 claiming exemption of agricultural income amounting to ₹98,460. The claim was based on the contention that...

Inordinate Delay of 476 Days Condoned and Full Exemption of Leave Encashment Allowed up to ₹25 Lakhs under Section 10(10AA): Ram Dev Daiya vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a senior citizen and retired employee of Life Insurance Corporation of India, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2020-21 claiming exemption of ₹13,12,806 on account of leav...

Reassessment under Section 147 Quashed for Non-Issuance of Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2); Entire Assessment Declared Null and Void: ITAT Agra in Prem Lata Verma vs. DCIT

Author
CA. Vivek kr. Jain
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 103
Read More »
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL-AGRAITA No. 441/Agr/2025  Prem Lata Verma-Appellant.VersusDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax-Respondent  Coram: S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERANDSUNIL KUMAR SIN...

Ex Parte CIT(A) Order and Reassessment under Section 147 Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication: ITAT Rajkot in Ila Jignesh Kumar Vakharia vs. ITO

Author
CA. Vivek kr. Jain
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL-RAJKOTITA No.600/RJT/2025 Ila Jignesh Kumar Vakharia-Appellant.VersusIncome Tax Officer-Respondent Coram: ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, J.Dated: 15/01/2026Decision:&...

Reassessment under Section 148 on Same Material is Invalid – Change of Opinion Not Permissible: Radhika Roy & Dr. Prannoy Roy v. DCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 360
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Ms. Radhika Roy and Dr. Prannoy Roy, were directors and 50% shareholders of RRPR Holding Private Limited. For Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10, Ms. Radhika Roy filed her return of income d...

ITAT Ahmedabad in Jentibhai Shambhubhai Prajapati v. ACIT Holds Section 150(1) Cannot Revive Time-Barred Assessments Quashed under Section 153C — Jurisdictional Defects Are Incurable

Author
CA. Vivek kr. Jain
17/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to assessment proceedings under section 153C read with section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014-15 and 2016-17, pursuant to a search cond...