Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/s Ansal Properties and Industries Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Taxability of Security Deposit as Undisclosed Income under Sections 158B(b), 158BA & 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe case arose from a search and seizure operation under Section 132 conducted on the Ansal Group. During the search, a confidential note was seized indicating that a transaction involving ₹42 ...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. | Section 260A Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court | CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 | Revenue Appeal Dismissed on Low Tax Effect

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 103
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court against a consolidated order involving Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. The appeals were filed under Section 260A of the Income Ta...

Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) – Restoration of Appeal & Right to Challenge Royalty Attribution, (Section 260A (Appeal to High Court))

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant-assessee had filed appeals before the Delhi High Court for Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. During the hearing, the assessee chose not to press the appeals on account of sm...

Oscar Fernandes & Rahul Gandhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax Proceedings Dismissed

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioners approached the Delhi High Court by way of writ petitions under Article 226. The petitions were filed against actions of the Income Tax Department. Multiple ...

Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Restoration of Appeal & Royalty Attribution Issue, (Income tax act,1961)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd., had filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court for Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. During the hearing, the assessee chose not to p...

Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi & Anr. – Withdrawal of Appeal Does Not Bar Future Adjudication on Merits under Income Tax Act,1961

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 109
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe appellant-assessee, Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd., had filed multiple appeals concerning assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06.During earlier proceedings dated 20 September 2018, t...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–7 vs Reebok India Company (2018) – Section 36(1)(iii) Interest Deduction on Unsecured Loans | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee, Reebok India Company, had borrowed unsecured loans amounting to ₹502.69 crores and paid interest on them. It had also advanced ₹172.59 crores to third part...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-3) vs Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 110
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals (ITA Nos. 985, 988, 989, 990, 991, 992 of 2018) against Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. arising from a common consolidated order.At the outset, delay in filing and re-filin...

Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Jurisdiction of TPO under Section 271G & Timing of Default

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 110
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd., filed its return for AY 2011–12 along with a transfer pricing report. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) issued a notice dated 18.02.2014 requiring productio...

Oscar Fernandes & Rahul Gandhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax Proceedings Dismissed

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 109
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioners approached the Delhi High Court by way of writ petitions under Article 226. The petitions were filed against actions of the Income Tax Department. Multiple ...