Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 vs M/s Times Internet Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 37(1), Section 260A Income Tax Act | Allowability of Business Expenditure After Sale of Business Vertical & Website Development Expenditure as Revenue Expenditure

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 102
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee had transferred certain business segments including Medianet and content selling business. Despite such transfer, the assessee continued to claim business expenditure comp...

M/s Fiberfill Engineers vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Delay in Filing Return, Deduction under Section 80IC, Reassessment under Sections 147/148 and Condonation under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 109
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s Fiberfill Engineers, is a partnership firm engaged in works contracts and manufacturing signages and fabricated structures through its manufacturing unit situated at Sitarganj, Utta...

Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax | Taxability of Unsold Flats Held as Stock-in-Trade under Sections 22 & 23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in the business of real estate development and construction, had completed certain residential and commercial units which remained unsold and continued to be reflected as s...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Denso India Limited | Delhi High Court on Scope of Rectification under Section 154 and Penalty under Section 271C of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDenso India Limited engaged expatriate technicians deputed by its parent company in Japan for its manufacturing operations in India. The Indian entity paid salary in India and provided accommodation, w...

Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax | Taxability of Unsold Flats Held as Stock-in-Trade under Sections 22 & 23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in the business of construction and sale of residential and commercial properties, retained certain flats as unsold inventory (stock-in-trade). These properties remained in its p...

CIT vs Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd. & Ankit Gupta | Delhi High Court on Validity of Section 153C Proceedings and Requirement of “Belonging To” Seized Documents under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 109
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of appeals arose from search and seizure operations conducted in the BM Gupta Group cases. During the course of the search, certain documents were seized by the Department. Based on ...

Taxability of Non-Compete Fee Received on Retirement – Whether Non-Compete Compensation Constitutes Capital Receipt or Revenue Receipt under Section 28(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 106
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessee, Mrs. Tara Sinha, was serving as the President of Tara Sinha McCann Erickson Pvt. Ltd. (TSME), a leading advertising agency, and held 51% shareholding in the company. During As...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Denso India Limited (Delhi High Court) – Scope of Rectification under Section 154 vis-à-vis Review of Appellate Order and Penalty under Section 271C for Failure to Deduct TDS on Expatriate Salary

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDenso India Limited, engaged in manufacturing operations, had expatriate technicians deputed from its Japanese parent entity. These employees received salary partly in India and partly in Japan.During ...

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (South), New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-76(1), New Delhi & Ors. | Delhi High Court on Maintainability of Writ Petition Against ITAT Order

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (South), New Delhi, instituted multiple writ petitions before the Delhi High Court against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and other respondents ...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Indrapuram Habitat Centre Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Validity of Project Completion Method under Section 145 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 111
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, a builder and developer engaged in construction projects including commercial buildings, had consistently followed the Project Completion Method for recognizing revenue. Durin...