Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
TDS Credit under Section 194Q Cannot Be Denied Due to Form 26AS Mismatch in Case of Kachha Arhatiya: Brijesh Kumar Angi (HUF) vs. ITO (ITAT Jodhpur)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Brijesh Kumar Angi (HUF), carrying on
business as a Kachha Arhatiya under the name M/s Murari Lal Om Prakash at
Padampur, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2022-23 claiming ...
Cash Sales during Demonetisation Cannot Be Added Without Proper Appellate Adjudication: Matter Remanded for Violation of Natural Justice – Anil Kumar Jain vs. ITO (ITAT Jodhpur)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Anil Kumar Jain, proprietor of M/s
Gehna 58, Bada Bazar, Udaipur, filed his return of income for Assessment Year
2017-18. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made an add...
Addition under Section 69 Restored for Fresh Verification Where Source Claimed through Rotation of Funds Based on Seized Material: Shri Ummaid Mal Singhvi vs. ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur)
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Ummaid Mal Singhvi, was subjected to assessment
proceedings for Assessment Year 2008-09 pursuant to search-related proceedings.
The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹5,66,600 ...
Appeal against Rejection of Section 80G Approval Dismissed as Withdrawn at Assessee’s Request: Shri Bhattarak Yashkirti Digamber Jain Dharmarth Trust vs. CIT(E) (ITAT Jodhpur)
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Bhattarak Yashkirti Digamber Jain Dharmarth Trust,
Rishabdev, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur
Bench, challenging the order dated 20.03.2024 passed b...
Employees’ PF/ESI Disallowance Upheld Following Supreme Court Ruling in Checkmate Services; Arrear Contribution Issue Restored for Verification: SIS Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Patna)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, SIS Limited, Patna, filed its return
of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 on 28.11.2018 declaring total income of
₹46,25,56,430. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and stat...
Addition under Section 69A Deleted Where Source of Bank Time Deposit Explained through NEFT Transfer: Shiya Sharan Roy vs. Assessment Unit (ITAT Patna)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Shiya Sharan Roy, Patna, did not file
a return of income under Section 139 for Assessment Year 2019-20. The case was
selected under the Risk Management Strategy as a non-filer, and proce...
Assessment Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction as NFAC Order Passed Prior to Effective Notification: Kalawati Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT / NFAC, Delhi (ITAT Patna)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Kalawati Enterprises Private Limited,
Patna, filed an appeal against the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi...
Ex Parte Dismissal by CIT(A) Set Aside After Condonation of 590 Days’ Delay: Matter Restored for Adjudication on Merits – Chanchal Kumar vs. ITO, Ward-6(4), Patna (ITAT)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Chanchal Kumar, did not file a return
of income for Assessment Year 2016-17. The case was reopened under Section 147
of the Income-tax Act and the Assessing Officer completed the assessm...
Ex Parte Dismissal by CIT(A) After Granting Only One Opportunity Violates Principles of Natural Justice: ITAT Ranchi Restores Appeals – Sudisa Foundry Private Limited vs. DCIT
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Sudisa Foundry Private Limited,
filed appeals before the ITAT against the orders passed by the CIT(A),
Patna-3, Patna, dated 28 April 2023, for Assessment Years 2014-15,
2015-16 and 201...
Dismissal of Appeal for Single Non-Appearance Set Aside in Interest of Natural Justice and Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication: ITAT Ranchi in Sudisa Enterprises Private Limited vs. DCIT
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sudisa Enterprises Private Limited, filed appeals
before the ITAT against the orders passed by the CIT(A), Patna-3, Patna for
Assessment Years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17. The CIT(A) had...