Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Revision under Section 263 Quashed for Absence of Error and Prejudice to Revenue: Vikash Kumar Bohra vs. Principal CIT, Asansol (ITAT)
Facts of the CaseThe
assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 and the
assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer. The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax invoked revisionary jurisdiction...
Assessment Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Limited Scrutiny and Violation of CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016: Subodh Adhikary vs. ITO, Ward-51(1), Kolkata (ITAT)
Facts of the CaseThe
assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 11.01.2016
declaring total income of ₹5,86,810. The case was selected for scrutiny under
CASS for limited scrutiny specifically...
Assessment Quashed for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction: Notice under Section 143(2) Issued by Non-Jurisdictional ITO in Violation of CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 – Rajroop Doshi vs. ITO, Kolkata (ITAT)
Facts of the CaseThe
assessee filed a revised return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 on
27.03.2018 declaring total income of ₹47,89,100. The case was selected for
scrutiny through CASS for examination of capit...
Reassessment Notice under Section 148 Quashed as Time-Barred under Rajeev Bansal Ruling: Sunblaze Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17. The
Assessing Officer issued notice under Section 148 on 29.06.2021 under the
erstwhile reassessment regime. Pursuant to the Supreme...
Section 68 Addition on Share Capital Remanded Where CIT(A) Exceeded Jurisdiction by Issuing Set-Aside Directions: ITO vs. Favourite Cloth Merchants Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company filed its return of income for Assessment Year
2012-13 declaring total income of ₹480. The return was processed under Section
143(1) and later selected for scrutiny under CASS. N...
Delhi High Court on Refund of Tax Recovered Despite Stay – Section 220(6), Shree Krishna Steel Traders v Union of India (W.P.(C) 8187/2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Shree
Krishna Steel Traders, challenged the recovery of income-tax demand during
the pendency of its statutory appeal for Assessment Year 2021–22. The
Assessing Officer had passe...
Assessment under Section 153C Invalid Without Incriminating Material: ITAT Delhi in JSP Projects (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
In JSP Projects (P) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle-13, Delhi (ITAT Delhi, order dated 09 January 2026), the
Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an
asses...
Exemption under Section 10(37) on Compulsory Acquisition of Urban Agricultural Land: ITAT Delhi in ITO v. Dharam Singh
In Income
Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Faridabad v. Dharam Singh (ITAT Delhi, order dated
09 January 2026), the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed
the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the grant of exem...
Penalty for Cash Deposits Not Sustainable Once Quantum Explained: ITAT Delhi in Mohd. Javed v. ITO
In
Mohd. Javed v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-48(1), Delhi (ITAT Delhi, order
dated 09 January 2026), the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
examined the validity of penalties imposed under Sections 271A an...
Reassessment Quashed for Failure to Issue Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2) within Limitation: ITAT Delhi in Agrico Organics Ltd. v. DCIT
The assessee company filed an
appeal against the order dated 19 March 2025 passed by the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals)–29, New Delhi, arising from a reassessment order dated 21
December 2018 passed under sect...