Benefit of Section 115BAA Denied Where Option Not Exercised in Return; CBDT Circular on Form 10-IC Does Not Cure Substantive Lapse: Sarla Holdings Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sarla Holdings Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2020-21 on 13.02.2021 within the extended due date under Section 139(1), declaring total income of ₹60,9...

Reassessment Quashed Where Reopening Based Solely on Penny Stock Investigation Reports Lacked Live Nexus with Assessee: Sanjay Kaul vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sanjay Kaul, was an employee of M/s Laureate Education Pvt. Ltd. and filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2014-15 declaring taxable income of ₹7,86,72,780 and paid tax of ...

Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Quashed Following Revenue’s Concession in Rajeev Bansal; Notices Issued After 01.04.2021 Not Sustainable: Rajiv Kumar Khandelwal vs. DCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rajiv Kumar Khandelwal, is an individual who filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 30.09.2015 declaring an income of ₹1,36,81,160. The Assessing Officer issued a ...

Reassessment Sustained Where Section 148 Notice Digitally Signed on 31.03.2021 but Issued on 01.04.2021 Attracts Ashish Agarwal Regime: Rajesh Chopra vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rajesh Chopra, an individual resident of New Delhi, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2013-14 on 08.08.2013 declaring total income of ₹20,59,151. A notice dated 31.03.202...

DCF Valuation Substantiated by Expert Cannot Be Rejected on Generic Disclaimers; Section 56(2)(viib) Addition Set Aside – PCIT-1 vs. A.H. Multisoft Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2016–17. The Tribunal...

Section 153A Assessment Without Incriminating Material Unsustainable; Kabul Chawla and Abhisar Buildwell Applied – PCIT-1 vs. Charvak Trading Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 23
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 16.06.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2010–11. The Tribunal...

Repair and Maintenance Services of Aircraft Equipment Do Not “Make Available” Technical Knowledge; Receipts Not Taxable as FTS/FIS under India–US DTAA – PCIT (International Taxation) vs. Goodrich Corporation (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2018–19. The Tribunal...

Protective Additions Under Section 68 Not Sustainable Once Substantive Additions Made in Hands of Beneficiaries; Shell Conduit Cannot Be Taxed – PCIT, Delhi-7 vs. Third Generation Traders Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 23
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging a common order dated 20.09.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2012-13 to...

Addition on Alleged Bogus Purchases and Sales Leads to Double Taxation Where Income Already Offered; Section 145(3) Not Properly Invoked – PCIT (Central), Ludhiana vs. Garg Acrylics Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order dated 27.10.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2011–12. The T...

Form 26AS Mismatch Due to Apparent Errors Not “Tangible Material” for Reopening; Reassessment Based on Erroneous TDS Data Invalid – PCIT vs. Sanjay Pratap Singh (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sanjay Pratap Singh, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2009–10 on 25.07.2009 declaring total income of ₹10,92,498/-, comprising salary income and income from other source...