Facts of the CaseThe Revenue Department preferred three interconnected
statutory income tax appeals—specifically ITA Nos. 692/2004, 694/2004, and
695/2004—before the High Court of Delhi. These appeals were preferre...
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, M/s Japan External Trade
Organisation (JETRO), had made payment of rent to its landlord without
deducting tax at source under Section 194-I of the Income-tax Act.The Income Tax...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which
had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-ta...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (the Appellant) preferred an appeal before the
High Court of Delhi under the provisions of Section 260A of the Income-tax Act,
1961. This statutory appeal challenged the validity of an appe...
Facts of the CaseA search operation was conducted at the premises of the assessee,
Shri Dinesh Gupta. During the block assessment proceedings, the Revenue alleged
that the assessee had invested an amount higher than wh...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Bal Krishan Gupta, had received certain
loan amounts which were reflected in his books of account. During assessment
proceedings, the Assessing Officer treated these loans as unexpla...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, M/s P.S.B. Housing Finance Ltd.,
was subjected to penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had deleted the
penal...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal whereby the penalty imposed upon the assessee under Section 271(1)(c)
of the Income-tax Act was deleted.The Commissioner of Income ...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Vikramajit Singh, had repaid an amount received
from a sister concern, which according to the Revenue constituted repayment of
a loan. The Assessing Officer held that such repayment was m...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi
High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT),
which had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Inco...