Reassessment for AY 2013–14 Remanded to AO to Examine Surviving Period under Amended Law; Rajeev Bansal and Ram Balram Buildhome Applied – Mahendra Kumar Jhanwar vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the initial notice dated 17.06.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 under the old regime, the subsequent notice dated 28.05.2022 issued under Section 148A...

Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Competent to Initiate Reassessment Despite Faceless Regime; TKS Builders Reaffirmed – Mount Shikhar Financial Services Ltd. vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 15
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mount Shikhar Financial Services Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), through issuance of notice und...

Rejection of Delay Condonation for Form 10BB Set Aside; Authority Directed to Decide Earlier Application under Section 119(2)(b): Anupam Gian Vikas Pari Shad vs. CIT (Exemption) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anupam Gian Vikas Pari Shad, is a charitable trust registered under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act and entitled to claim exemption under Section 10(23C). The trust has been running ...

Credit of Advance Tax Paid under Predecessor PAN to Be Granted Manually; Revenue Directed to Issue Paper Refund and Stay Demand – Landmark Property Development Co. Ltd. vs. DCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 16
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Landmark Property Development Co. Ltd., approached the Delhi High Court seeking credit of advance tax that had been paid under the PAN of its predecessor entity but was required to be g...

Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and Faceless Assessing Officer Have Concurrent Power to Issue Reassessment Notice; TKS Builders Reaffirmed – Inder Dev Gupta vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Inder Dev Gupta, filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-27(1), by issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income-ta...

Reassessment Set Aside Where No Information Suggesting Escapement of Income; Matter Remanded for Fresh Reasoned Order – Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.A. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 117
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.A., is a non-resident entity. It filed the present writ petition challenging the notice dated 27.03.2025 issued under Section 148A(1), the order dated ...

Rectification under Section 254(2) Cannot Be Used to Review Tribunal’s Final Order; Long-Drawn Litigation Put to Rest – Hindustan Sports Club Ltd. vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Hindustan Sports Club Limited, challenged the order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissing Miscellaneous Application No. 02/Del/2021 filed under Sectio...

Reassessment Order and Notice Set Aside on Revenue’s Concession; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration after Hearing – Deepak Gupta vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Deepak Gupta, challenged the order dated 13.06.2025 passed under Section 148A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 along with the consequential notice issued under Section 148 initiating reas...

Charitable Status of Hamdard Reaffirmed; Exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv) and Sections 11–12 Cannot Be Denied on Alleged Rent Concession – CIT(E) vs. Hamdard Laboratories (India) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 27.09.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, for Assessment Year 2016–17. Th...

Bank Account Attachment under Section 226(3) Directed to Be Lifted on 20% Deposit; Opportunity to Seek Stay from CIT Preserved – Boang Technology Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Boang Technology Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 24.09.2025 issued under Section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the order dated 23.09.2025 rejectin...