Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
661,264
Growing community

Dinesh Dahiya vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-20 | Delhi High Court | Section 68, 147, 148 Income Tax Act | Unexplained Cash Deposit & Presumptive Income on Share Trading

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, did not file his Return of Income (ROI) for Assessment Year 2011–12. Subsequently, the Income Tax Department identified cash deposits amounting to ₹10,51,885/- in h...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs Standard Chartered Grindlays Pty Ltd (Delhi High Court) – Expenses Attributable to Indian Business Not Covered Under Section 44C

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2003–04, wherein the Revenue challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed certain expe...

Subodh Gupta vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Assessment Orders Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice in Virtual Hearing

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Subodh Gupta, challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years 2015–16 and 2016–17. The challenge was limited to violation of principles of natural justice. Show cause noti...

Subodh Gupta vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Assessment Orders Set Aside Due to Breach of Natural Justice in Video Conferencing Hearing [Sections 143(3), Principles of Natural Justice]

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Subodh Gupta, filed writ petitions concerning Assessment Years 2015–16 and 2016–17 challenging assessment orders dated 30.05.2023 and 31.05.2023 passed by the Assessing Officer.The ...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3, Delhi vs Hike Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Revenue vs Capital Expenditure | Section 143(3) | AY 2013-14 & 2014-15

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Hike Private Limited, filed its return declaring substantial losses for AY 2014-15. The case was selected for scrutiny, and assessment was completed under Section ...

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/s Azure Retreat Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 68, 143(3), 153A/153B & 260A – Condonation of Delay & Deletion of Share Capital Addition

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 166
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.The case pertains to Assess...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3, Delhi vs Hike Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Revenue vs Capital Expenditure | Sections 28 & 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Hike Private Limited, filed its return declaring substantial losses. The Assessing Officer (AO), during scrutiny under Section 143(3), disallowed expenses of â...

Rakesh Kumar Mohindroo vs Income Tax Officer Ward 59(3), Delhi & Anr. – Challenge to Reassessment Proceedings u/s 148A & 148 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 96
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2019–20, wherein the petitioner challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department.The challenge was specifically ma...

Bid Services Division (Mauritius) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Proceedings Kept in Abeyance Pending AAR Decision

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 89
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Bid Services Division (Mauritius) Limited, challenged a reassessment notice dated 27.01.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.During the pendency of the writ petiti...

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. (Delhi High Court) – Section 36(1)(va), Section 143(1), Section 139(1) – Allowability of Employees’ PF Contribution Deposited on Next Working Day Due to National Holiday

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 103
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had allowed deduction to the assessee in respect of employees’ contribution towards Provident ...