Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

C.I.T. vs. M/s Indo Kopp Ltd.: Delhi High Court Holds Interest Paid to Trade Creditors Cannot Be Disallowed Under Section 37(1) Due to Non-Recovery of Interest from Trade Debtors

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, M/s Indo Kopp Ltd., filed its income tax return claiming a business deduction of ₹16,23,432/-. This sum represented the actual interest amount paid by the company to its trad...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Ilac Investment Pvt. Ltd. | Section 68 Income Tax Act: Unexplained Cash Credits & Share Application Money

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 24
Read More »
Facts of the Case For the assessment year 1989-90, the respondent-assessee disclosed a sum of ₹4,75,000/- received as share application money within its income tax return. The Assessing Off...

C.I.T. vs. M/S Sony India (P) Ltd.: Allowability of Warranty Provision as Deduction Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee's Business Operations: The assessee, M/S Sony India (P) Ltd., is a prominent corporate entity engaged in the widespread manufacture, marketing, and sale of televisions (TVs)...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Delta Foods Pvt. Ltd.: Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure on Factory Repairs under Section 37(1)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessment Context: The dispute arose during the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1997-98. The respondent-assessee, M/s Delta Foods Pvt. Ltd., filed its regular ret...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Tools India P. Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Loss Assessments & Precedent of Aditya Chemicals

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 15
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT Ruling: The dispute originated when the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) passed an order in favor of the respondent-assessee, M/S Tools India P. Ltd., effectively deleti...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Bharat Gears Ltd. – Whether Excise Duty is to be Excluded from Total Turnover for Deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The dispute concerned the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC of ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Tools India P. Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Loss Assessments & Precedent of Aditya Chemicals

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT Ruling: The dispute originated when the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) passed an order in favor of the respondent-assessee, M/S Tools India P. Ltd., effectively deleti...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Mittal Corporation: Whether Commission Earned by Buying Agents from Foreign Enterprises via Commercial Knowledge and Experience is Eligible for Tax Deduction Under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Independent of Rendering Technical Services

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The Respondent-Assessee (M/s. Mittal Corporation) is a registered partnership firm resident in India acting as buying agents for foreign business enterprises, namely M/s. G.J. Coles ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Mittal Corporation: Interpretation of Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Regarding Deductions on Commission Earned from Foreign Enterprises for Providing Commercial Knowledge, Experience, and Skill

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee, M/s. Mittal Corporation, is a registered partnership firm and a resident in India. The assessee acted as a buying agent for foreign enterprises, specifica...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II, Delhi vs. M/s Mayar India Limited: Jurisdictional Mandate of Recording Prior Satisfaction in the Assessment Order under Section 271 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as a Prerequisite Condition for the Lawful Initiation of Penalty Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
19/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessment and Penalty Initiation: The matter originated from assessment proceedings conducted by the Assessing Officer (AO) against the assessee, M/s Mayar India Limited. While ...