Interest u/s 220(2) Not Leviable Before Fresh Section 156 Demand Notice: ITAT Mumbai in Samsara Shipping (P) Ltd. v. ITO [TS-1710-ITAT-2025(Mum)]

Author
CA. NITIN KANWAR
29/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 417
Read More »
Levy of interest under section 220(2) for period prior to fresh demand notice under section 156, unsustainable Mumbai ITAT allows Assessee’s appeal observing that the levy of interest under section 220(2) in the prese...

No Tax on Trust with Overall Deficit Even if Activities Alleged Commercial: ITAT Mumbai in The Mysore Association Bombay v. ITO [TS-1713-ITAT-2025(Mum)]

Author
My Tax Expert
29/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 359
Read More »
No tax on Trust with overall deficit even if activity alleged to be commercialAssessee trust is registered under section 12A of the Act and filed its return of income declaring total income at Nil claiming exemption unde...

Bombay HC Quashes Assessment for Granting Only 3 Days to Respond: Minimum 7-Day Response to SCN Mandatory as per CBDT SOP in Dhiraj Lakhamshi Shah v. NFAC (AY 2020-21)

Author
CA. NITIN KANWAR
28/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1419
Read More »
Mumbai High Court holds that assessment order passed with only three days’ response time to show cause notice issued under Section 144B(6)(xvi) violates natural justice and is liable to be quashed notwithstanding time-...

Levy of Interest u/s 220(2) Held Invalid Prior to Fresh Demand Notice u/s 156: ITAT Mumbai in Samsara Shipping (P) Ltd. v. ITO (AY 2021-22)

Author
My Tax Expert
28/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 717
Read More »
Mumbai ITAT allows Assessee’s appeal observing that the levy of interest under section 220(2) in the present case is impermissible in terms of statutory provisions; Highlighting that in the demand notice under section ...

Government Rehabilitation Subsidy Held Capital Receipt: Purpose Test Applied | Dharmapuri District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. v. DCIT (Madras HC, 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 781
Read More »
Government subsidy under rehabilitation scheme, a capital receipt not revenue receipt; Purpose test to be appliedFor the assessment year 2007-08, the appellant filed its return of income admitting a loss of Rs. 58,46,770...

Vocational Training as ‘Education’ under Section 2(15): Karnataka HC Allows Section 11 Exemption Despite Surplus | Deshpande Education Trust v. ACIT (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 794
Read More »
Vocational training for rural youth qualifies as ‘education’ under section 2(15); Surplus generation no bar to exemption under section 11. The appellant is a registered trust under Section 12AA of the Act engaged in...

Eligibility of Partner’s Remuneration for Presumptive Taxation u/s 44ADA: ITAT Delhi Allows 44ADA Benefit to Chartered Accountant Partner | Ranu Gupta vs ACIT (2025)

Author
CA DR VINAY MITTAL
26/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 3114
Read More »
The appeal before the ITAT Delhi (SMC Bench) in the case of Sh. Ranu Gupta vs ACIT, National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi for AY 2018-19 concerns the applicability of Section 44ADA to remuneration received by a Chartered A...

Reopening Notice by Jurisdictional AO Instead of Faceless AO Quashed: Rahul Bagrecha v. DCIT (2025) | Invalid Section 148 Notice & Assessment Under Faceless Regime

Author
My Tax Expert
25/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 819
Read More »
Reopening notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) was to be quashed. The Jurisdicational Assessing Officer issued reopening notice dated 24.03.2024 to the asses...

Sales Discount to Stockists Not Commission – No TDS u/s 194H: Mumbai ITAT in Novartis Healthcare (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (TDS) Following Piramal Healthcare (Bom HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 441
Read More »
Sales discount to stockists/wholesalers, not commission, not liable to TDS under section 194H Mumbai ITAT holds that the transaction between the Assessee (Novartis Healthcare (P) Ltd. - A pharmaceutical trading company)...

Non-Compete Fee: Revenue or Capital Expenditure? Supreme Court in Sharp Business System (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2025) on Section 37(1), Enduring Benefit Test & Depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
24/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 566
Read More »
Nature of Expenditure – Non-Compete FeeCapital or Revenue | Allowability of Depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) Sharp Business System (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income TaxSupreme Court | Civil Appea...