Ex Parte Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind Where CIT(A) Confirmed Incorrect Addition of Cash Deposits During Demonetisation: Ahmedali Kurbanhusain Piplodwala & Co. vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 191
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Ahmedali Kurbanhusain Piplodwala & Co., filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 against the order dated 30.07.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Fa...

Exemption under Sections 11 and 12 Cannot Be Denied for Delayed Filing of Form 10BB When Filed Before Processing under Section 143(1): Kinkini vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 422
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kinkini, Bhilwara, an AOP-Trust engaged in charitable activities, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2023-24 claiming exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act....

Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition under Section 69A Restored for Fresh Verification Where Assessee Disputed Ownership of Bank Account: Buniya Amin vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 364
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Buniya Amin, filed no return or replies during reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2017-18. The case was reopened under Section 147 on the basis of information regarding cash dep...

Post Finance Act, 2015 amendment, all Govt. subsidies taxable as income under section 2(24) irrespective of nature, ITAT Chennai in India Cements Ltd vs DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 328
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by M/s. The India Cements Limited against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessment involved multiple additions ...

Applications under Sections 12AB and 80G Restored for Fresh Adjudication Due to Non-Compliance and Misunderstanding of Earlier Remand Directions: Shrimad Dayanand Shiksha Samiti vs. CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 276
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shrimad Dayanand Shiksha Samiti, Bhilwara, filed applications seeking registration under Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act and approval under Section 80G. These applications were initial...

Interest on Borrowed Capital Not Allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) Prior to Business Use but Allowable under Section 24(b): Rup Kumar Ramchandani vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 467
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual carrying on business through his proprietorship concern “M/s SHE”, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 claiming interest expenditure of ₹11,82,661 ...

Capital Gains on Compulsory Acquisition of Agricultural Land Eligible for Section 10(37) Exemption and Issues Restored for Fresh Verification: Tej Pal Singh vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 367
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual government employee, received compensation of ₹5,89,563 during Assessment Year 2014-15 on compulsory acquisition of three plots of land measuring 260 square meters by the...

Penalty under Section 270A Upheld Where Income Was Under-Reported and Additions Were Not Covered by Estimation Exclusion: Shri Shyam Construction Company vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 334
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Shyam Construction Company, engaged in construction contract work and supply of building materials, filed its return of income for Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19. During asse...

Reassessment Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction Where Reasons Pertained to Wrong Assessment Year: Kanhaiya Lal Hari Narayan vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Author
My Tax Expert
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 248
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm, was subjected to reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2013-14 based on information received from the DDIT (Investigation), Karnal regarding alleged accommodat...

Revision u/s 264 – PCIT bound to follow ITAT Special Bench: Tax on Deemed STCG u/s 50 at LTCG rate u/s 112, Samir N. Bhojwani. vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. Writ Petition (L) No. 37709 of 2025

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
21/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 333
Read More »
Core Issue:-Whether, while exercising revisionary jurisdiction under Section 264, the PCIT can refuse to follow a binding decision of the ITAT Special Bench and deny levy of tax at LTCG rate under Section 112 on capit...