Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 8
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 4
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Anil Singhal vs Directorate of Income Tax Investigation & Anr. (2021:DHC:20-DB) – Abuse of Process of Court in Tax Evasion Petitions under Income Tax Informants Reward Scheme
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anil Singhal, filed a writ petition
seeking a mandamus directing the Directorate of Income Tax Investigation
and CBDT authorities to conduct a time-bound investigation based on Tax
Eva...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–12 vs Smt. Krishna Devi & Ors. (Delhi High Court) – Bogus LTCG Addition u/s 68 & 115BBE Not Sustainable Without Evidence
Facts of the Case
The
assessee declared income including exempt LTCG under Section 10(38).
The
Assessing Officer (AO) treated LTCG from sale of shares of M/s Gold Line
International Finvest Ltd. as...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-12 vs Smt. Krishna Devi & Ors. (Delhi High Court) – Addition under Section 68 r/w 115BBE on Alleged Bogus LTCG from Penny Stocks Deleted
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a common order passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The Respondent-Assessee, an indiv...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-12 vs Smt. Krishna Devi & Ors. (Delhi High Court) – Addition under Section 68 on Alleged Bogus LTCG from Penny Stocks Unsustainable Without Independent Enquiry
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessees, including Smt. Krishna Devi, had
declared income from various sources and claimed exemption of Long-Term Capital
Gains (LTCG) under Section 10(38) arising from sale of shares ...
Dev Wines Sales Corporation vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-10 (2021:DHC:509-DB) – Transfer of Jurisdiction under Section 127 of Income Tax Act Upheld
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Dev Wines Sales Corporation, challenged an order dated 15
January 2021 transferring its jurisdiction from Delhi to Faridabad.
The
petitioner contended that it had ...
Actis Advisers Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2021) – Withdrawal of Appeal under Direct Tax Viva Vishwas Act, 2020
Facts of the CaseThe appellant/assessee, Actis Advisers Pvt. Ltd., had
filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging certain tax-related
issues under the Income Tax Act. During the pendency of the appeal, the...
Rakesh Arora vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Withdrawal of Appeal under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Rakesh Arora, had filed an appeal before the
Delhi High Court under the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the pendency of the
appeal, the appellant opted to settle the dispute under the Direc...
Pradeep Kumar Jindal vs PCIT-7 New Delhi: ITAT Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Without Deciding on Merits – Delhi High Court Clarifies Rule 24 ITAT Rules
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner filed an appeal before ITAT for Assessment Year 2008-09.
The
appeal was dismissed on 10 December 2015 due to non-appearance and
alleged lack of prosecution.
...
Actis Advisers Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2021) – Withdrawal of Appeal under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
Facts of the CaseThe appellant/assessee, Actis Advisers Pvt. Ltd., filed an
application seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal. The request was
made on the ground that the assessee had initiated steps to res...
Shyam Sunder Sethi vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 & Ors (Delhi High Court, 2021) – Rejection of Vivad Se Vishwas Application Without Reasons Held Invalid | Section 2(1)(a), Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Shyam Sunder Sethi, filed his income tax
return for AY 2011–12 declaring income of ₹49,32,900 and claimed exemption
under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, resulting in nil ca...