Facts of the CaseAs per the order, multiple appeals were filed by JC Bamford
Excavators Ltd. and JC Bamford Investments Ltd. against the Income Tax
Authorities. These appeals were listed under various ITA numbers befor...
Facts of the Case
Multiple
appeals (ITA Nos. 687/2014, 69/2015, 589/2015, 485/2015, 307/2018,
81/2017, 309/2018) were filed by JC Bamford group entities.
The
appeals were directed against orders pa...
Facts of the Case
The
assessee, engaged in construction and real estate business, made payments
of ₹17,00,20,000/- to a contractor.
TDS
amounting to ₹34,00,400/- was deducted but deposite...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax)
filed appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 against the respondent, M/s Cliff Scaffoldings Pvt. Ltd.Duri...
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the
Delhi High Court challenging a common order dated 9 August 2018 passed
by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years 2012–1...
Facts of
the CaseThe assessee, a real estate developer, filed its return for AY
2008–09 claiming deductions on various expenditures including brokerage,
software expenses, and payments for maintenance service...
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the
Delhi High Court challenging a common order dated 9 August 2018 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years 2012–1...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi
High Court against the respondent assessee, Vineet Gupta. During the hearing,
counsel for the Revenue submitted that the tax effect involved in the
...
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the
Delhi High Court challenging a common order dated 9 August 2018 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years 2012–1...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner filed its Income Tax Return for AY 2013–14 declaring TDS of
₹15,62,500.
However,
an additional TDS of ₹31,25,000 was not claimed due to oversight.
Th...