Facts of
the Case
The assessees had paid taxes through advance tax, TDS and other tax
payments.
Subsequent assessments resulted in tax demands due to additions and
disallowances made by the Assessing Off...
FACTS OF THE CASE1.
The
appeals were filed by several assessees including The Motor & General
Finance Ltd., MGF India Ltd., Goodwill (India) Ltd., and MGM (India) Ltd.
against orders...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred appeals before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order passed in favour of the assessee. During the
hearing, it was brought to the notice of the Court that the controversy rais...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year
2001-02.
The Assessing Officer disallowed proportionate expenditure
allegedly incurred for earning dividend income which was ...
Facts of the
Case
Multiple appeals bearing ITA Nos. 867, 878, 879 and 880 of 2007
were filed before the Delhi High Court.
The Revenue sought adjudication of the issues involved in the
respective appeals....
Facts of the
Case
An assessment was originally framed under Section 143(3) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Revenue challenged the order of the CIT(A).
During the pendency of the proceedings, a search operat...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred
multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court. During consideration
of the appeals, it was noted that the tax effect involved in each matter was
substantially below the...
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) levied
interest under Sections 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This
interest was computed on the basis of the assessed income rather than the
returned income. Whi...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue had filed
multiple income-tax appeals before the Delhi High Court.The tax effect involved
in each appeal was less than Rs. 4 lakhs.The Court examined the
maintainability of the appeals in ...
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue filed Income Tax Appeals bearing ITA Nos. 867, 878, 879
and 880 of 2007 before the Delhi High Court.
The Court considered the tax effect involved in each appeal.
It was no...