Exemption under Section 54F Allowed Despite Prior Construction and Joint Ownership: Sale of Shares and Investment in Residential House – Saroj Goenka vs. ITO, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 203
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed her return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 declaring total income of ₹1,87,69,130. During the year, she sold 36,00,000 shares of Emami Ltd. on 13.07.2020 for a total conside...

Rental Income Taxable as Income from House Property and Jurisdictional Objection Rejected under Section 124: Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 151
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 declaring a loss of ₹1,46,903. During the relevant year, the assessee earned rental income of ₹9,48...

Addition under Section 56(2)(x) Deleted in Tax-Neutral Demerger: Compliance with Section 2(19AA) and Section 47(vib) Upheld – ACIT vs. Emami Realty Limited (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Emami Realty Limited, is a listed company engaged in real estate development. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement approved by the NCLT, the real estate undertaking of Oriental Sales Age...

Reopening under Section 148 after Search Upheld and Addition Restricted to Gross Profit on Undisclosed Purchases: Shakambhari Ispat & Power Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 149
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Shakambhari Ispat & Power Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 declaring total income of ₹17,25,39,330 under normal provisions and ₹51,82,85,619 under ...

Reopening after Post-01.04.2021 Search Upheld but Section 68 Addition on Sale of Investments Deleted for Arbitrary and Inconsistent Approach: BMS Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 on 31.10.2019 declaring income under normal and MAT provisions. A search under Section 132 was conducted on 17.09.2021 on the Agarwal...

Reopening Quashed as Change of Opinion without New Tangible Material: West Bengal Electronics Industry Development Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT(A), NFAC (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 106
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a Government of West Bengal undertaking and nodal agency for development of the IT and IT-enabled services sector in the State, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on ...

Sections 56(2)(viia) and 50D Validly Applied to Share Allotment and Sale to Group Entities: Madhur Coal Mining Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 29.09.2015 declaring nil income and a current year loss of ₹10,31,82,416. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS ...

Deletion of Entire Bogus Purchase Addition Upheld Where Sales Accepted and Books Not Rejected: ITO, Ward-1(2), Siliguri vs. Binoy Agarwal (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Binoy Agarwal, is engaged in the business of trading in furnishing items and filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 on 01.03.2022 declaring total income of ₹1,33,64,769....

Revision under Section 263 Quashed for Absence of Error and Prejudice to Revenue: Vikash Kumar Bohra vs. Principal CIT, Asansol (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 and the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax invoked revisionary jurisdiction...

Assessment Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Limited Scrutiny and Violation of CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016: Subodh Adhikary vs. ITO, Ward-51(1), Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 127
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 11.01.2016 declaring total income of ₹5,86,810. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS for limited scrutiny specifically...