Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of appeals against
several international and domestic airlines (including Singapore Airlines, KLM
Royal Dutch Airlines, British Airways, Air France, and Lufthansa German
...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Mukesh Luthra, claimed deduction
under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of export income.
The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings by issuing
no...
Facts of the Case
Reintroduction
of Section 194H: Section 194H was
reintroduced into the statute book by the Finance Act, 2001, effective
from June 1, 2001. Following this, the Income Tax Department d...
Facts
of the CaseThe Revenue (Appellant) filed appeals
(ITA Nos. 57/2009 and 341/2009) before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court against the
orders passed in favor of the assessee, M/s Jagson International Ltd
(Responden...
Facts of the Case
Parties
& Group Appeals: This case involves a batch
of appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against
various international air carriers including Singapore Ai...
Facts of the
CaseThe present case involved the validity of
reassessment notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Sections 147
and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and
1...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue preferred a batch of appeals against various international and
domestic airlines operating in India.
A
survey under Section 133A revealed that the assessee-airlines su...
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue preferred a batch of appeals directed against several national and
international airlines operating from India (with the lead case being CIT
vs. Singapore Airlines Ltd. f...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of appeals before
the High Court of Delhi involving 12 different international air carriers
(including Singapore Airlines, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, British Airways, Air
...
Facts
of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income
Tax-II) preferred two statutory tax appeals, designated as ITA No. 57/2009 and
ITA No. 341/2009, before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi under the provisions
of t...