Estimated Income under Section 145(3) Reduced by Deducting Declared Business Income: Assessee Entitled to Set-Off of Returned Profit – Ashok Prasad Gupta vs. ITO (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual engaged in the country liquor business, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 on 04.01.2017 declaring total income of ₹3,97,510. The case was selected fo...

Addition under Section 68 Deleted Where Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness Established: Pancham Marketings Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-5(1), Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Pancham Marketings Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2022-23 on 30.09.2022 declaring total income of ₹21,96,23,000 and book profit under Section 115JB of ₹21,...

Bogus Sale Addition Remanded to Avoid Double Taxation and Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Quashed as Time-Barred: Nezone Tubes Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 95
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Nezone Tubes Limited, is engaged in the business of manufacturing M.S. Pipes and Galvanized Pipes. For Assessment Year 2011-12, the assessee filed its return declaring total income of â‚...

Section 14A Disallowance and Ad-hoc Expense Disallowances Set Aside: Matter Remanded for Fresh Examination – Century Commotrade Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Century Commotrade Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2013-14 on 26.09.2013 declaring total income of ₹17,08,950. The case was selected for scrutiny and no...

Addition under Section 68 on Share Capital and Premium Deleted for AY 2008-09: Proviso to Section 68 Not Retrospective – Abhiruchi Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 96
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Abhiruchi Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 declaring total income of ₹157. The case was initially processed under Section 143(1) and subseque...

Addition under Section 68 Deleted Where Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness Proved Despite Non-Appearance of Share Subscribers: Happy Homes & Houses Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 26.09.2012 declaring total income of ₹1,120. The case was selected for scrutiny on account of large share premium received. Duri...

Reassessment Quashed Beyond Four Years for Borrowed Satisfaction and Non-Speaking Disposal of Objections: Shree Krishna Gyanodaya Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 154
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 on 30.09.2011 declaring nil income. The assessment was completed under Sections 153A read with 143(3) on 27.03.2014 at nil income. S...

Reassessment Quashed for Borrowed Satisfaction and Bar of Limitation: DCIT vs. Vedanta Resources Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 154
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Vedanta Resources Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 08.08.2016 declaring total income of ₹6,100. A survey under Section 133A was earlier conduct...

Revenue Appeal Dismissed on Multiple Issues Including Section 14A, Capital vs Revenue Expenditure and Transfer Pricing Adjustments: DCIT vs. Eureka Forbes Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 154
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata for Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 in the case of Eureka Forbes L...

Addition under Section 68 on Share Capital Deleted for AY 2012-13: No Requirement to Explain Source of Source Prior to Proviso – Exotica Enclave Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Exotica Enclave Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in the business of real estate. It filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 24.12.2012 declaring total in...