Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
843,850
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/s Azure Retreat Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 68, 143(3), 153A/153B & 260A – Condonation of Delay & Deletion of Share Capital Addition

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 333
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.The case pertains to Assess...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3, Delhi vs Hike Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Revenue vs Capital Expenditure | Sections 28 & 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 198
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Hike Private Limited, filed its return declaring substantial losses. The Assessing Officer (AO), during scrutiny under Section 143(3), disallowed expenses of â...

Rakesh Kumar Mohindroo vs Income Tax Officer Ward 59(3), Delhi & Anr. – Challenge to Reassessment Proceedings u/s 148A & 148 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 160
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2019–20, wherein the petitioner challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department.The challenge was specifically ma...

Bid Services Division (Mauritius) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Proceedings Kept in Abeyance Pending AAR Decision

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Bid Services Division (Mauritius) Limited, challenged a reassessment notice dated 27.01.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.During the pendency of the writ petiti...

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. (Delhi High Court) – Section 36(1)(va), Section 143(1), Section 139(1) – Allowability of Employees’ PF Contribution Deposited on Next Working Day Due to National Holiday

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 172
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had allowed deduction to the assessee in respect of employees’ contribution towards Provident ...

Ramrati vs Income Tax Officer Ward 34(5), Delhi & Anr. – Reassessment Notice Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice under Sections 148A(d) & 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged an order passed under Section 148A(d) and the consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016–17.The revenue alleged that...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax–6 vs Mentor Graphics (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – No Interference in ITAT Findings u/s 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The dispute pertained to Assessment Year 2008–09. The Trib...

Shri Pradyot K. Misra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Reassessment Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice under Sections 143, 147, 148 & 151 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 334
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged reassessment orders dated 25.10.2016 passed under Sections 143 read with 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AYs 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12. The reassessment was ini...

Raminder Singh vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 52(1), New Delhi (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment u/s 148/148A & Limitation u/s 149 Explained

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 364
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner challenged the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department under Section 148. A notice under Section 148A(b) was issued alleging escapement of i...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi vs M/s Punjab and Sind Bank | Section 14A, Depreciation on Securities & Pension Fund Contribution | Delhi High Court (ITA 541/2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 164
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had granted relief to the assessee, i.e., Punjab and Sind Bank.The dispute primarily revolve...