Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Anuj Bansal | Delhi High Court | Section 153D Approval Held Invalid Due to Non-Application of Mind (AY 2017–18)
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed a return declaring income of ₹87,20,580.
The Assessing Officer (AO), however, made additions including:
₹15,04,35,000
towards cash deposits in bank
₹1,54,07,100
...
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Delhi vs GS1 India (Formerly EAN India) | Section 2(15) Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court (ITA 391/2023)
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order
dated 06.08.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning
Assessment Year 2013–14. The dispute centered on whether the activiti...
Shashi Bala Sharma vs Income Tax Officer Ward 59(8), Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Reassessment u/s 147 & Denial of Section 54 Exemption Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the reassessment order passed under Section
147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act for AY 2018–19 along with
the consequential demand notice under Section 156, bot...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd (Delhi High Court) – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable Due to Defective Notice & Debatable Issue
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal arose from Assessment Year 2011–12, wherein
the assessee, M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd, filed its
return declaring income of ₹1,20,19,74,162, later revised to ₹1...
Unipatch Rubber Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 80IC Deduction Not Allowed on Interest Income from Fixed Deposits Securing Entry Tax Liability
Facts of the Case
The
case pertains to Assessment Year 2014–15.
The
appellant, Unipatch Rubber Ltd., challenged the order of the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31.05.2022.
The
asses...
Vandana Griha Nirman Limited vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(1), Delhi (2023) – Invalid Assessment Against Non-Existent Entity Quashed by Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vandana Griha Nirman Limited (VGNL),
challenged an assessment order dated 24.05.2023 passed by the Assessing Officer
(AO) for AY 2015–16.The core issue arose because:
The
asse...
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs Heidrick and Struggles Inc. – Rectification under Section 154 Not Denied for Wrong Head of Income Reporting (Delhi High Court)
Facts of the CaseThe respondent/assessee filed its return declaring income of
₹2.84 crore received for services rendered to an Indian entity under the head
“Income from Other Sources.”The return was processed und...
Cairnhill CGPE Limited & Anr. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2, New Delhi | Section 163 & 263 Income Tax Act Case
Facts of the Case
The
petitioners purchased shares of Mankind Pharmaceuticals Limited from Monet
Limited, a Mauritius-based entity.
The
transaction was governed by a Share Purchase Agreement dated ...
Cairnhill CGPE Limited & Cairnhill CIPEF Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2, New Delhi – Delhi High Court | Section 163 & 263 Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Cairnhill CGPE Limited and Cairnhill CIPEF
Limited, had purchased shares of Mankind Pharmaceuticals Limited from Monet
Limited, a Mauritius-based entity. The transaction was governed b...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 New Delhi vs Network Programme India Ltd – Reassessment u/s 147/148 Invalid Due to Change of Opinion & Absence of Tangible Material (AY 2002-03)
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT), which had ruled in favour of the assessee. The reassessment
proceedings were initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) on two...