Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1) vs VALLEY IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. | Delhi High Court | Section 271(1)(c) r/w Section 43B Income Tax Act | Voluntary Disallowance & Penalty Deletion

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 199
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2014–15, wherein the Revenue challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the In...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd. | Section 153C | No Addition Without Incriminating Material | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 23.11.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), arising from proceedings relating to Assessment Year (AY) 2008–0...

Dauphin Travel Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1), Delhi & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Section 142(1) Income Tax Act | Violation of Natural Justice due to Improper Notice & Insufficient Response Time

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASEThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year 2013–14 wherein the petitioner challenged the assessment order dated 25.05.2023. The grievance raised was that statutory notices issued under Sec...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs Micro & Small Enterprises Facilitation Council & Anr. – Jurisdiction Conflict Between Income Tax Act & MSMED Act on Special Audit Fees (Delhi High Court, 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 155
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department appointed a Chartered Accountant firm (registered as a Micro Enterprise) as a Special Auditor under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act for conducting audits of multiple en...

Manujendra Shah vs Commissioner of Income Tax-8 & Anr. – Reassessment Quashed Due to Non-Application of Mind under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed his return for AY 2011–12, which was processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 148 alleging that i...

Manujendra Shah vs Commissioner of Income Tax-8 & Anr. – Reassessment Quashed Due to Non-Application of Mind under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 159
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed his return for AY 2011–12, which was processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 148 alleging that i...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Micro & Small Enterprise Facilitation Council & Anr. – Delhi High Court on MSMED Act vs Income Tax Act (Section 142(2A) Special Audit Fee Dispute)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 168
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Income Tax Department appointed a CA Firm (M/s SBG & Co.) as Special Auditor under Section 142(2A). After completion of audits, the CA Firm raised invoices claiming subst...

CCTEB India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle-17) & Anr. – Delhi High Court | Stay on Tax Demand | Section 281B Income Tax Act | 20% Deposit Rule Clarified

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 149
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner faced a total tax demand of ₹56.48 crore across three assessment years. The department directed payment of ₹35.42 crore pending appeal before CIT(A). B...

CCTEB India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-17 & Anr. – Delhi High Court (AY 2019-20 to 2021-22 | Section 281B | Stay of Demand | 20% Deposit Rule)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, CCTEB India Private Limited, faced tax demands for AYs 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22, aggregating to approximately ₹56.48 crores. The Principal Commissione...

S.B. Distributors & Ors. vs Income Tax Officer Ward 35(1) Delhi & Ors. – Invalid Reassessment Without Show Cause Notice | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
09/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the assessment order dated 29.05.2023 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was contended that the Asse...