Facts of the Case
The
Appellant (Revenue/CIT) filed three appeals against the Assessee, Anita
Jain, for the Assessment Years (AYs) 1999-2000, 2000-2001, and 2001-2002.
The
Assessee had a history of...
Facts of the Case
This
batch of interconnected writ petitions arises out of a common
administrative order dated October 13, 2008, passed by the Deputy
Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-13, Ne...
Facts
of the Case·
The Petitioner, Jal Hotels Company
Ltd., filed its regular Income Tax returns along with copies of four distinct
commercial agreements executed with...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioners filed writ petitions challenging a common order dated October
13, 2008, passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central
Circle-13, New Delhi.
The
im...
Facts of the Case
The
writ petitions were filed against a common order dated October 13, 2008,
passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-13, New
Delhi.
The
Revenue issue...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioners filed a cluster of writ petitions challenging a common order
dated October 13, 2008, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax,
Central Circle-13, New Delhi.
...
Facts
of the Case·
Assessee’s Return
Submission: The Petitioner, Jal Hotels Co. Ltd.,
filed its Income Tax Returns for the Assessment Years 2001-2002, 2002-2003, and...
Facts of the Case
The
Parties: The Appellants represent the Revenue
Department (Commissioner of Income Tax). The Respondents/Assessees are
various telecom companies (such as Bharti Cellular Ltd., Esco...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Income Tax Department) preferred an appeal (ITA
No. 71/2009) before the High Court of Delhi against the respondent assessment
order/tribunal order. Alongside the main appeal, a miscellaneo...
Facts of the Case
The
respondents/assessees are telecom companies providing cellular mobile
telephone services to subscribers within their respective circles assigned
by the Department of Telecommunic...