Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-1) vs. Virender Kumar Bhatia | Section 260A r/w Sections 132, 158BC & 158BD Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 143
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-assessee, Virender Kumar Bhatia, had incorporated M/s Baani Technologies Pvt. Ltd., which owned land measuring approximately 2.36 acres in Wazirabad, Gurugram. Subsequently, during FY 2...

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–4 vs Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd (2019) – Section 254(2) Time Limitation Case

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals against the respondent (assessee), Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. The dispute arose from orders passed by the ITAT under Section 254(2)...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Sunil Lamba (2019) – Taxability of Non-Compete Fee & Transfer of Self-Generated Trademark under Sections 263, 55(2), 28 & 47 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe case pertains to Assessment Year 1995–96, where the assessee, Sunil Lamba, received: ₹1 crore as non-compete fee under an agreement with Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. ₹1.85 c...

Director, Directorate of Income Tax (HRD) & Ors. vs Ramesh Dang & Ors. – Pay Parity Claim of Technical Assistants Rejected by Delhi High Court (2019:DHC:5719-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners (Directorate of Income Tax and Union authorities) challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which had directed granting pay parity to Technical Assistants with ...

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax–4 vs Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. (2019:DHC:7412-DB) | Section 254(2) IT Act – Time Limit for ITAT Rectification

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 149
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The core issue arose from the Tribunal entertaining and deciding applications filed by the ...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Ankush Saluja (2019) – Section 68 & 153C IT Act | No Addition Without Incriminating Material | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the Case A search and seizure operation under Section 132 was conducted on the Saluja Group. Cash and jewellery relating to the assessee (Ankush Saluja) were found at his father’s ...

Ritu Mishra & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 32(1), New Delhi (2019:DHC:7496) – Petition Dismissed in Default After Conviction by Trial Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 185
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseAs recorded in the order, the petitioners, Ritu Mishra and Swadesh Kumar Mishra, had filed criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging proceedings initiated by the I...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 254(2) Time Limitation & ITAT Rectification Powers

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed by the ITAT under Section 254(2), whereby the Tribunal had allowed rectification applications and restored the appeals fo...

Chetan Sabharwal & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Reopening of Assessment under Sections 147/148 & Validity of “Reasons to Believe”

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
Facts of the Case Petitioners Chetan Sabharwal and Nitin Sabharwal sold shares of Pawan Impex Pvt. Ltd. and SVIIT Software Pvt. Ltd. through Share Purchase Agreements. The sale consideration ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Jagdish Prasad Gupta (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Section 43B Applicability on Licence Fee & Mercantile Liability

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jagdish Prasad Gupta, was allotted land by Northern Railways in 1975. Over time, the Railways periodically revised and enhanced the licence fee, sometimes retrospectively, and also...