Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax–2 vs British Motor Car Co. (1934) Ltd. | Section 32(2) Income Tax Act | Unabsorbed Depreciation Carry Forward Beyond 8 Years | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to earlier assessment years, the earliest being Assessment Year 1998–99. During Assessment Year 2010–11, the assessee claimed set-off of such car...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. M/s Hind Nihon Proteins Pvt. Ltd. | Allowability of Commission Expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Hind Nihon Proteins Pvt. Ltd., claimed deduction for commission payments made to two partnership firms, namely M/s Sikand Farm and M/s R&A Exports, for procuring business orders. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Hind Nihon Proteins Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Allowability of Commission Expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act and Scope of Interference under Section 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Hind Nihon Proteins Pvt. Ltd., claimed deduction of commission paid to two partnership firms, namely M/s Sikand Farm and M/s R&A Exports, for procuring business orders.The Assessi...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs M/s Hind Nihon Proteins Pvt. Ltd. – Allowability of Commission Expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Hind Nihon Proteins Pvt. Ltd., had paid commission to two partnership firms, namely M/s Sikand Farm and M/s R&A Exports, for procuring business orders. These entities were related...

Oriental Bank of Commerce vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Deductibility of Provision for Interest on Overdue Fixed Deposits under Mercantile System | Section 37(1), Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a scheduled bank, claimed deduction of approximately ₹17 crores towards interest payable on overdue fixed deposits in its return of income. The liability was calculated at the savings b...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/s Banaras House Ltd. Section 80HHC & Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Deduction on Net Interest and Cessation of Liability on Outstanding Creditors | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court concerning Assessment Year 1996–97 against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The dispute revolved a...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-11 vs Satya Sheel Khosla | Delhi High Court | Taxability of Non-Compete Fee as Capital or Revenue Receipt under Sections 17(3), 28(va) & 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mr. Satya Sheel Khosla, was the promoter and Director of Integra Overseas Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing two-wheelers in India. Subsequently, Suzuki Motor Corporation becam...

Commissioner of Gift Tax v. M/s Jindal Equipment Leasing & Ors. | Reassessment under Section 16(1) of the Gift Tax Act on Renunciation of Rights Issue and Deemed Gift Taxability

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees were shareholders in Jindal Strips Limited (JSL) and were entitled to subscribe to rights shares pursuant to a Partly Convertible Debenture (PCD) issue. Each shareholder was entitled to o...

M/s Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Taxability of Sub-License Fee under Sections 22, 27 & 269UA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Whether a Licensee Can Be Treated as Owner for House Property Income

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Asian Hotels Ltd. constructed Hyatt Regency Delhi with an attached shopping plaza. The assessee, M/s Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd., entered into a license agreement dated 14 January 1986 for the...

M/s Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Taxability of Sub-License Fee under Sections 22, 27 & 269UA of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
02/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd. entered into a license agreement dated 14 January 1986 with Asian Hotels Ltd. for the use of four commercial shops situated in the shopping plaza of Hyatt Regency, ...