Royalty to Parent Company Cannot Be Treated as ‘Nil’: Delhi High Court Upholds Arm’s Length Royalty in PCIT-8 v. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 327
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSamsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (STI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Korea, was engaged in manufacturing and selling mobile phones in India and overseas markets. Under ...

Genuine Export Proceeds Not Taxable as Undisclosed Income: Delhi High Court Upholds ITAT in PCIT v. Arun Malhotra (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 257
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal arose from block assessment proceedings covering the period 1 April 1989 to 14 July 1999 in the case of Arun Malhotra. The matter had undergone multiple rounds of litigation before the Incom...

Capitation Fee by Educational Trust Defeats Charitable Status: Delhi High Court Denies Section 11 Exemption in PCIT (Central)-1 v. Maharaji Education Trust (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 266
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had declared reassessment proceedings under Section 148 invalid for Assessment Year 2007-08 in the case of Maharaji Edu...

No Addition Without Incriminating Material in Search Assessments: Delhi High Court Upholds ITAT in PCIT (Central)-2 v. Satya Prakash Gupta (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 237
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to Assessment Years 2012-13 to 2017-18 in the case of the respondent, Shri Satya Prakash Gupta. The assessee, ...

Assessing Officer Must Give Full Effect to ITAT Relief: Delhi High Court Allows Deduction Claim in MUFG Bank Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 225
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMUFG Bank Ltd., the petitioner, challenged an order dated 13 May 2022 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) denying deduction of ₹9,62,39,916. The impugned order was passed to give effect to a prior d...

Assessee Entitled to Raise Fresh Claims Before Tribunal Despite Return Filed: Delhi High Court Quashes Assessment in Mitsubishi Corporation v. ACIT (International Tax) (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 220
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mitsubishi Corporation, a company incorporated in Japan and a tax resident of Japan, challenged draft and final assessment orders for AY 2005-06 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO). Th...

Reassessment Notice Beyond Limitation Invalid: Delhi High Court Quashes Section 148 Proceedings for AY 2016-17 in Manju Somani v. ITO Ward-70(1) (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 302
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 through notice dated 29 April 2024 issued under Section 148 of the Incom...

Income Tax Settlement Commission Can Add Undisclosed Income Beyond Disclosure: Delhi High Court in Madhuri Dhanuka v. PCIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 228
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed by members of the Dhanuka family, including individuals and HUFs, challenging a common order dated 26.06.2019 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC). ...

Composite Sports Management Services Not Fully Taxable as FTS: Delhi High Court on PE Attribution & “Make Available” Test in International Management Group (UK) Ltd. v. CIT (International Taxation) (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 210
Read More »
Facts of the CaseInternational Management Group (UK) Ltd. (IMG), a UK-based entity, challenged orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2018-19. IMG had entered into a Memorand...

Reassessment Notice Issued in the Name of a Deceased Assessee Is Void Ab Initio; Proceedings Cannot Continue Without Notice to Legal Heirs under Section 159 – Dharmendra Deo Mishra (L/H of Late Kamal Mishra) vs ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 227
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Dharmendra Deo Mishra, is the legal heir of Late Smt. Kamal Mishra, who expired on 18 April 2017. The death of the original assessee was duly intimated to the Income Tax Department on ...