Facts of the Case
A
search under Section 132 was conducted on the J.P. Minda Group on
20.09.2013.
Certain
documents allegedly related to Heaven Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. (assessee)
were found durin...
Facts of
the CaseThe petitioner/assessee filed a writ petition challenging the
order dated 05.03.2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(PCIT), whereby the application under Section 264 of the Income ...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a public sector undertaking engaged in printing
banknotes and minting coins, filed its return declaring income of ₹512.53
crore.During assessment under Section 143(3), the Assessing Off...
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Indus Towers Limited, challenged the
intimation dated 01.09.2023 issued under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act,
1961, whereby the Respondent (Income Tax Department) adjusted the refund...
Facts of the
CaseThe respondent/assessee, M/s New Delhi Tyre House,
acted as a distributor for Exxonmobil Lubricants Pvt. Ltd. under a Marketing
Assistance Programme (MAP) agreement.During Assessment Year 2013–14:
...
Facts of the
Case
The appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2013–14.
The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed 10% of miscellaneous
expenses claimed by the assessee.
The CIT(A) reduced this disallowance to 2%. ...
Facts of the CaseThe
present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2019–20, wherein the
petitioners were subjected to reassessment proceedings initiated under Section
148A(b) of the Income Tax Act.The...
Facts of the
CaseThe present appeal pertains to Assessment Year
2007–08, wherein the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal dated 14.01.2019. The dispute revolved around two key issues:
...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Incredible Unique Buildcon Pvt.
Ltd., filed a writ petition concerning Assessment Year 2011–12. The
petitioner had provided services to Clutch Auto Ltd., which deducted tax at
sourc...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Karuna Abhushan Private Limited,
challenged the assessment order dated 18.05.2023 passed by the Income Tax
Department for Assessment Year 2017–18.The petitioner contended that:
A d...