Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi
High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT),
which had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Inco...
Facts
of the Case·
In January and February 1994, the
petitioners individually approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission by
filing applications under Section 245C...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner was one of several assessees who had
approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission in 1994 by filing applications
under Section 245C of the Income-tax Act. After considering the materi...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner had approached the Income Tax
Settlement Commission under Chapter XIX-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 seeking
settlement of tax liabilities. The Settlement Commission, after following the
...
Fact of the caseThe petitioner, Narayan Lal Saraf, was among
several assessees who had approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission by
filing settlement applications under Section 245C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
...
Facts of the CaseThe petition formed part of a group of writ
petitions involving assessees who had approached the Income Tax Settlement
Commission in 1994 by filing applications under Section 245C of the Income-tax
Ac...
Facts
of the CaseThe petitioner, an individual
associated with a business concern paying income tax, challenged a revisional
order dated August 25, 1993, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under
Section 264 of ...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s DCM Limited, had credited certain
amounts to the Molasses Storage Fund out of the sale proceeds of
molasses during the relevant assessment years.The amounts involved were:
Assessmen...
Facts of the
CaseM/s DCM Limited, the assessee, filed appeals before
the Delhi High Court concerning the inclusion of amounts credited to the Molasses
Storage Fund in its taxable income.For Assessment Year 1988-89, th...