Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 8
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 4
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Dr. Ashok Kumar Sinha vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Tax 3(1)(2), Delhi & Anr. – Reassessment u/s 148 & 148A Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind (Delhi High Court)
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner challenged:
Notice
dated 23.03.2023 issued under Section 148A(b)
Order
dated 24.04.2023 under Section 148A(d)
Consequential
notice under Sectio...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-4 vs Nestlé India Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Disallowance of License Fee, Section 14A & Depreciation Issues AY 2010-11
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2010–11,
wherein the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) dated 31.07.2020. The dispute primarily revolved around mu...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | AY 2009-10 | No Addition Without Incriminating Material
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the
order dated 23.11.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The
dispute relates to Assessment Year 2009–10.The core issue ar...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs Sumitomo Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | AY 2015-16 & 2016-17 | No Substantial Question of Law
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue filed appeals before the High Court against the order of the ITAT
dated 24.11.2021.
The
appeals related to AY 2015-16 and AY 2016-17.
There
was a delay of 214...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Anuj Bansal (2023) – Delhi High Court | Invalid Approval u/s 153D due to Non-Application of Mind
Facts of the CaseThe respondent/assessee filed a return declaring income of
₹87,20,580. The Assessing Officer (AO), while framing assessment under Sections
153A read with 143(3), made significant additions including:...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-4 vs Nestle India Ltd (Delhi High Court) – No Substantial Question of Law on Disallowance, Section 14A & Depreciation Issues
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 31.07.2020 concerning Assessment
Year 2011–12.The Assessing Officer (AO) had made mul...
Jyoti Narang vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) – Breach of Natural Justice due to Incorrect Email Service of Show Cause Notice under Income Tax Proceedings
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed before the Delhi High
Court by the petitioner, Jyoti Narang, challenging the assessment order dated
23.05.2023 passed by the Income Tax Department.The petitioner con...
Vodafone Roaming Services SARL vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment & Natural Justice under Sections 148A, 144C IT Act
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Vodafone Roaming Services SARL, is a tax resident of
Luxembourg.
The
Revenue alleged that the petitioner failed to file a return for AY
2014–15.
I...
Siemens Industry Software NV vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax), Circle 3(1)(2), New Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | AY 2019-20 | Reassessment due to Incorrect TDS Entry Set Aside
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year (AY)
2019–20. The petitioner, Siemens Industry Software NV, was subjected
to reassessment proceedings triggered due to an error in the Tax Deduct...
Sukhdeep Singh Chadha vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Violation of Natural Justice under Sections 143(3) & 144B of Income Tax Act
Facts of the Case
The
case pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2021–22.
A
show cause notice dated 07.06.2023 was issued proposing variation in
taxable income.
The
petitioner was given time ...