Bombay HC Quashes Assessment for Granting Only 3 Days to Respond: Minimum 7-Day Response to SCN Mandatory as per CBDT SOP in Dhiraj Lakhamshi Shah v. NFAC (AY 2020-21)

Author
CA. NITIN KANWAR
28/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1421
Read More »
Mumbai High Court holds that assessment order passed with only three days’ response time to show cause notice issued under Section 144B(6)(xvi) violates natural justice and is liable to be quashed notwithstanding time-...

Levy of Interest u/s 220(2) Held Invalid Prior to Fresh Demand Notice u/s 156: ITAT Mumbai in Samsara Shipping (P) Ltd. v. ITO (AY 2021-22)

Author
My Tax Expert
28/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 717
Read More »
Mumbai ITAT allows Assessee’s appeal observing that the levy of interest under section 220(2) in the present case is impermissible in terms of statutory provisions; Highlighting that in the demand notice under section ...

FAQs on key accounting implications arising from the New Labour Codes, New Labour Codes (2025): Key Accounting Implications on Gratuity, Leave Obligation, Interim Reporting, Exceptional Item Presentation & Tax Treatment under Ind AS / Indian GAAP

Author
My Tax Expert
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1535
Read More »
FAQs on key accounting implications arising from the New Labour Codes The Government of India has recently consolidated 29 existing labour legislations into a unified framework comprising fou...

Delhi HC: Revenue Appeal Maintainable Despite Low Tax Effect Due to Accommodation Entry Exception; Reassessment Quashed for Invalid Section 151 Approval | Pr. CIT-1 v. Agroha Fincap Ltd. (2025)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 828
Read More »
Delhi High Court:-Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 VersusM/s Agroha Fincap Ltd.ITA No. 60/2024 | Judgment dated: 23 December 2025 CORE ISSUE:-Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue before the High Court wa...

Registration of Legal Heir / Representative Assessee on the Income-tax e-Filing / ITBA Portal Procedure, Documentary Requirements and Indemnity Format

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1371
Read More »
Registration of Legal Heir / Representative Assessee on the Income-tax e-Filing / ITBA PortalProcedure, Documentary Requirements and Indemnity Format 1. IntroductionWith the progressive digitisation of income-tax...

Government Rehabilitation Subsidy Held Capital Receipt: Purpose Test Applied | Dharmapuri District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. v. DCIT (Madras HC, 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 781
Read More »
Government subsidy under rehabilitation scheme, a capital receipt not revenue receipt; Purpose test to be appliedFor the assessment year 2007-08, the appellant filed its return of income admitting a loss of Rs. 58,46,770...

Vocational Training as ‘Education’ under Section 2(15): Karnataka HC Allows Section 11 Exemption Despite Surplus | Deshpande Education Trust v. ACIT (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 796
Read More »
Vocational training for rural youth qualifies as ‘education’ under section 2(15); Surplus generation no bar to exemption under section 11. The appellant is a registered trust under Section 12AA of the Act engaged in...

Eligibility of Partner’s Remuneration for Presumptive Taxation u/s 44ADA: ITAT Delhi Allows 44ADA Benefit to Chartered Accountant Partner | Ranu Gupta vs ACIT (2025)

Author
CA DR VINAY MITTAL
26/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 3118
Read More »
The appeal before the ITAT Delhi (SMC Bench) in the case of Sh. Ranu Gupta vs ACIT, National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi for AY 2018-19 concerns the applicability of Section 44ADA to remuneration received by a Chartered A...

Incorrect PIN Code in E-Way Bill Held Minor Error: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Seizure & Penalty under Section 129 | RC Sales and Services vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Author
My Tax Expert
26/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1004
Read More »
The Allahabad High Court in Rc Sales And Services vs State Of Uttar Pradesh quashed GST seizure and penalty orders under Section 129 of the CGST Act. The court ruled that an incorrect PIN code in the e-way bill constitut...

Reopening Notice by Jurisdictional AO Instead of Faceless AO Quashed: Rahul Bagrecha v. DCIT (2025) | Invalid Section 148 Notice & Assessment Under Faceless Regime

Author
My Tax Expert
25/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 820
Read More »
Reopening notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) was to be quashed. The Jurisdicational Assessing Officer issued reopening notice dated 24.03.2024 to the asses...