Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 8
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 4
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax–7 vs Rayban Sun Optics India Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Bright Line Test & AMP Expenses | AY 2007-08
Facts of the Case
The
appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the ITAT order dated
22.01.2021 for AY 2007-08.
The
ITAT relied on the decision in Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication vs.
CIT...
Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Connected Matters vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 73(1), Delhi & Ors. (2022:DHC:2743-DB)
Facts of the
Case
Petitioners filed declarations under Forms 1 and 2 on 26
March 2021.
While filing, they inadvertently excluded the interest component
from the declared amount.
The department issued...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax–7 vs. Sharp Business Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Bright Line Test in AMP Expenses Not Valid under Transfer Pricing Law (Section 92C, Income Tax Act)
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi
High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 10 December 2020 for Assessment Year 2011–12. The dispu...
Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 73(1), Delhi & Ors. (2022:DHC:2743-DB) – Rectification of Form 3 under DTVSV Act Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, including Celerity Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd. and various ATS group entities, filed declarations under the Direct
Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act) through Forms 1 and 2 on 26t...
Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 73(1), Delhi & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Rectification of Form 3 under Vivad Se Vishwas Act due to Wrong Minor Head (200 vs 400)
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioners, including Celerity Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd. and other group entities, filed declarations under the DTVSV Act
through Forms 1 and 2 on 26 March 2021. However, while declaring the tax p...
Salil Gulati vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 49(1) Delhi & Ors. – Validity of Reassessment Notice under Sections 148 & 149 of Income Tax Act in Light of TOLA and Ashish Agarwal Judgment (Delhi High Court, 2022)
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Salil Gulati, filed a writ petition
challenging the order passed under Section 148A(d) and the reassessment notice
issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Ye...
Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 73(1), Delhi & Ors. (2022:DHC:2743-DB) (Delhi High Court | Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act | Rectification of Form 3 | Minor Head Error in Challans)
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, including Celerity Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd. and various ATS group companies, filed declarations under the Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act) through Forms 1 and 2 on 26...
Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 73(1), Delhi & Ors. (2022:DHC:2743-DB)
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners filed declarations under the Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 through Forms 1 and 2 on 26 March 2021. However,
while filing, the amounts paid through challans were inadvertently d...
Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 73(1), Delhi & Ors. (2022:DHC:2743-DB) Delhi High Court | Rectification of Form 3 under DTVSV Act | Technical Error in Challan Head Cannot Deny Tax Credit
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, including Celerity Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd. and other connected entities, filed declarations under the Direct Tax
Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act) through Forms 1 and 2 on 26 Ma...
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) vs Professional Assistance for Development Action – Exemption under Section 11 allowed; Activities not hit by Proviso to Section 2(15) | Delhi High Court (2022:DHC:2676-DB)
Facts of the
CaseThe present Income Tax Appeal was filed by the
Appellant challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) in ITA No. 2826/Del./2017 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The ITAT ha...