M/S MRK Infra vs Sales Tax Officer/ Class II (STO), DGST, Ward 94 & Anr. — Natural Justice Violation in GST Demand — Scope of Reply/ Hearing Opportunity under GST & Article 226

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASEM/S MRK Infra (“Petitioner”), a GST‑registered entity, filed Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13185/2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging: Show Cause Notice (SCN) dat...

M/S Ahlcons India Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner, CGST, Delhi South Commissionerate & Anr. — Delhi High Court on Remand of CGST Tax Demand and Illegitimate Confirmation of Dropped Service Tax Liabilities

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/S Ahlcons India Pvt. Ltd., a construction and works contract service provider registered under Service Tax regime, faced multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued by the GST Departme...

Commissioner of Service Tax/CGST Delhi Vs. M/s Konark Exim Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. — Maintainability of Appeal Before High Court Under Section 35G/35L of the Central Excise Act; Taxability of Overseas Commission Under “Business Auxiliary Service” Under Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE These consolidated appeals arise from multiple service tax matters (including SERTA 5/2024, 7/2024, 8/2024, 9/2024 and 10/2024), where the Commissioner of Service Tax/CGST (Departmen...

Commissioner of Service Tax / CGST Delhi v. M/s Konark Exim Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Taxability of Overseas “Commission” Payments as Business Auxiliary Services under Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Service Tax/CGST (Appellants) challenged the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (CESTAT) order which had dealt with the question whether amounts paid by Indian e...

Chegg India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner CGST Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate & Ors. – Del HC (GST Refund ITC Remand) – 2025

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseChegg India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter “the Petitioner”) is an Indian company providing IT, content, software and related services to its overseas parent (Chegg Inc., USA). The Petitioner sought refund...

Chegg India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST & Ors. — Delhi High Court, 2025 (W.P.(C) 11718/2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the Case (Professional Narrative)Chegg India Pvt. Ltd. (“Petitioner”), a company engaged in software and content development services for its parent company outside India, filed writ petitions under Articl...

Chegg India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner CGST, MCIE & Ors. – Delhi High Court (8 Sep 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE• Petitioner Chegg India Pvt. Ltd., an EdTech company providing software & ITES services, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging rejection of ref...

Chegg India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner CGST Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate & Ors. — Validity of ITC Refund Rejections and Appellate Authority’s Powers under GST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASEPetitioner Chegg India Private Limited (an Indian company providing software/content development and IT/ITES services to its U.S. parent) filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constit...

Lokesh Pathak & Ors. vs Designated Committee (SVLDRS), Central GST, Delhi West — Eligibility of Redemption Fine and Seizure Cases under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (W.P.(C) 10622/2024 & Connected Matters)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 102
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE (Professional Language) The petitioners — Lokesh Pathak, M.P. Pathak through LRs, and Art N Glass India Pvt. Ltd. — challenged actions of the Designated Committee, SVLDRS, Centra...

Lokesh Pathak & Ors. v. Designated Committee (SVLDRS), Central GST, Delhi West — Redemption Fine Not Excludable from SVLDR Scheme Relief

Author
My Tax Expert
19/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 60
Read More »
Facts of the CasePetitioners — Lokesh Pathak, M.P. Pathak (Through Legal Representatives), and Art N Glass India Pvt. Ltd. — challenged the refusal of the Respondent Designated Committee (SVLDRS), Central GST, Delh...