Future Use of Agricultural Land by Purchaser Cannot Determine Taxability on Date of Sale: ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes LTCG Addition and Holds Section 50C Inapplicable | Jignesh Harshadbhai Patel v. ITO [2026]

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Future Intended Use of Agricultural Land by Purchaser Cannot Determine Nature of Land on Date of Transfer; ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes LTCG Addition and Holds Section 50C InapplicableFacts of the CaseThe assessee had sold cer...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gold Leaf Capital Corporation Ltd. | Section 68 Income Tax Act | Unexplained Share Application Money | Repeated Remand by ITAT Not Permissible for Filling Evidentiary Lacunae

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company received substantial amounts as share capital and share application money from various entities during Assessment Year 1995-96. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer...

Classic Papers Converters Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Delhi – Rejection of Waiver of Penalty under Section 273A of the Income Tax Act Upheld by Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseClassic Papers Converters Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, derived its income primarily from sub-letting of premises. Penalty proceedings were initiated against the company under Section 27...

CBDT e-Filing – ITR-2 Validation Rules (AY 2026-27)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
CBDT e-Filing – ITR-2 Validation Rules (AY 2026-27) (For income earned during FY 2025-26)Version 1.0 | Dated: 26 May 2026ImportantValidation failures are treated as Category A Errors. If any such error exists, ITR-...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II vs Kinetic Capital Finance Ltd. | Section 68 Income Tax Act | Addition of Public Deposits as Unexplained Cash Credits Deleted | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kinetic Capital Finance Ltd., a registered NBFC, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1998-99. During scrutiny proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) examined deposits received...

Classic Papers Converters Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Delhi | Interest under Section 220(2), Penalty under Section 221(1) & Rectification under Sections 154/254 of the Income Tax Act – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner company challenged two show-cause notices dated 23.12.2005 and 08.12.2006 issued under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and also challenged a rectification order dated 25.01...

Assessee vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Validity of Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 60
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed appeals before the Delhi High Court. The principal challenge in the appeals related to the reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The asses...

Assessee v. Commissioner of Income Tax – Challenge to Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court | ITA Nos. 1043/2011 & 1045/2011

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 59
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee challenged the reopening of assessment initiated under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had already granted substantial relief to the ass...

Beutex India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax – Addition under Section 68 for Bogus Share Capital and Failure to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company received share application money aggregating to ₹27,40,600 from eight individuals. During the relevant assessment year, an amount of ₹22,50,000 was credited towards share capit...

Nancy Crafts Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Where Assessee Made Full and True Disclosure Under Sections 147, 148 and 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseNancy Crafts Ltd., engaged in the manufacture and export of garments, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2001-02 declaring income of ₹34,63,640.The case was selected for scrutiny and asse...