Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeals Before Delhi High Court in ITA Nos. 1016, 1017 & 1020 of 2009

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the Case ITA Nos. 1016, 1017 and 1020 of 2009 were listed before the Delhi High Court. The appellant/assessee, through its counsel, requested permission to withdraw the appeals. The ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Name Not Reflected in Order) – ITA No. 931/2011 | Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal as Withdrawn

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAn appeal bearing ITA No. 931/2011 was pending before the Delhi High Court. At the time of hearing, counsel for the appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court accepted the request...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd. – Deduction under Section 80IA on Internet Services and Internet Telephony Cannot Be Denied in Subsequent Years After Initial Allowance | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company was originally incorporated as C.G. Graphnet Pvt. Ltd. and subsequently underwent changes in name and ownership before becoming Tata Communications Internet Serv...

Rahuljee & Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi High Court) – Allowability of Manufacturing Expenses, Proof of Business Expenditure and Reduction of Interest under Section 217 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing audio cassettes. It claimed deduction of ₹2,00,000 as manufacturing expenses allegedly paid to Mr. Sunil Kumar for asse...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee Company – Section 68 Addition on Flat Booking Advances | Delhi High Court on Tribunal's Power to Remand Matter for Fresh Investigation

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe dispute pertained to Assessment Year 2005-06. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee had received a total sum of ₹21,70,34,294/- as advance money tow...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee Company – Section 68 Addition on Advances Received from Flat Buyers | Delhi High Court Remands Matter to ITAT for Decision on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in a real estate project, received a total sum of ₹21,70,34,294 as advance money from 447 parties towards booking of flats for Assessment Year 2005-06.During assessment proceedi...

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IX vs. M/s Monoflex India Pvt. Ltd. & Others (2011) – Liability to Pay Unearned Increase on Auction Sale of Leasehold Property under Income Tax Recovery Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the Case Property No. A-35, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, New Delhi, a leasehold industrial plot, was attached and auctioned by the Tax Recovery Officer for recovery of income tax dues...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect Below ₹10 Lakh | ITA No. 1638/2010 (2011)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 81
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court in ITA No. 1638/2010. During the proceedings, it was brought to the notice of the Court that the tax effect involved in...

THAR SOLAR IRRIGATION vs. State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan HC): Relief on GST Registration Revocation and Delayed Appeals Under Sections 30 & 107

Author
CA. Abhishek Raja Ram
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 98
Read More »
GST registration was cancelled and appeal was delayed by 216 days due to illness and financial hardship — Rajasthan High Court condoned the delay to prevent denial of remedy and directed appeal to be heard on merits.Is...

NIKHIL DEBNATH vs. Union of India (Tripura HC): Valid Service of GST Notices Under Section 169(1)(b) Must Satisfy Statutory Requirements

Author
CA. Abhishek Raja Ram
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
Order was merely uploaded on GST portal and Speed Post delivery was not proved — Tripura High Court held prima facie violation of Section 169(1)(b) and protected the Assessee.IssueWhether the order-in-original under th...