ACME Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – ITA No. 521/2010 | Delhi High Court (2011) | Section 143(3), 147, 148 IT Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, ACME Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged the reassessment notice issued under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following an alleged escapement of income. The petiti...

CIT vs. [Assessee] | Genuineness of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Section 54F Exemption on Share Transactions Covered by Demat and Contract Notes Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessees filed their Income-Tax Returns declaring Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) arising from the sale of certain shares (including shares of M/s Nagesh Investment Pvt. Ltd. and...

CIT vs. M/s Nagesh Investment Pvt. Ltd.: Demat Proof and Banking Trails Defeat Section 68 Additions on LTCG Share Transactions

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessees filed their Income Tax Returns declaring Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) from the sale of certain shares and claimed exemptions under Section 54F of the Income-Tax Act. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nagesh Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (with CIT vs. Nisshan Indo Ltd. & Ors.) | Section 68 Unexplained Cash Credit on Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from Share Transactions

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
2. Facts of the Case The Assessees filed their Income-Tax Returns declaring Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) stemming from the sale of specific corporate shares. Consequent to this declaration, they cla...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessees | Genuineness of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) Under Section 68 vs. Section 54F of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessees filed their respective Income Tax Returns declaring Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) arising from the sale of shares (pertaining to M/s Nagesh Investment Pvt. Ltd. and M/...

Commissioner of Income Tax-V v. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (2011) – Delhi High Court on Section 35D Amortization, Excess Sugar Consumption Addition, Depreciation & MODVAT Credit

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd., claimed deduction of ₹8,02,000 being one-tenth of preliminary expenses amortized under Section 35D of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing O...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Nagesh Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Others | Genuineness of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) on Share Sale and Claim of Section 54F Exemption vs. Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessees filed their Income-Tax Returns declaring Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) arising from the sale of certain shares (pertaining to companies like M/s Nagesh Investment Pvt....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs. M/S Hydrocarbons India Ltd. Scope of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Powers to Admit Additional Grounds of Law under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
1. Facts of the Case Assessee Profile: The respondent-assessee, M/S Hydrocarbons India Ltd., was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission of India (ONGC). It was incorporated to...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Vibhu Talwar & Shravan Talwar | Non-Compete Fees Allocation under Section 55 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals pertain to ITA Nos. 892/2010 & 935/2010 before the High Court of Delhi, challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s order dated 6th March 2009. The assessees, Vibhu Talwar and Sh...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Vibhu Talwar & Shravan Talwar – Non-Compete Fees Allocation Dispute under Income Tax Act, Section 55 & 271(1)(c)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals arise from the common order dated 6th March 2009 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning the assessment of non-compete fees received by the assessees, Vibhu Talwar and Shravan Talw...