Prem Lata Bansal vs Income Tax Department – Dismissal of Appeals Under CBDT Guidelines on Tax Effect Threshold

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the Case: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal filed multiple tax appeals before the Delhi High Court. The combined tax effect of the appeals was ₹8.98 lakhs, which is below the ₹10 lakhs threshold as per t...

M/S Good Living Consultant P.L vs Union of India & Ors – Income Tax Seizure and Release Dispute (W.P.(C) 15315/2006, CM(M) 924/2007)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the Case:Two petitions, W.P.(C) 15315/2006 filed by M/S Good Living Consultant P.L and CM(M) 924/2007 filed by the Director of Income Tax (Investigation), were interlinked and heard together. Certain amount...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Revenue – Condonation of Delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in ITA 670/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
 Facts of the Case: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) decided the appeal on 28th February 2007. The Revenue filed an application under Section 254(2) seeking rectification of the order, claim...

CIT vs. [Assessee] | Genuineness of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Section 54F Exemption on Share Transactions Covered by Demat and Contract Notes Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessees filed their Income-Tax Returns declaring Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) arising from the sale of certain shares (including shares of M/s Nagesh Investment Pvt. Ltd. and...

Lachman Dass Bhatia Hingwala Pvt Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Section 254(2) Review Power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The petitioner had filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A Full Bench of the Delhi High Court had previously opined on the maintainability of such appeals and t...

ITA 447/2011: Assessment Year 2001-02 – Reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act – Appellant vs. Respondent – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2001-02. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a reassessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act on 22nd March 2004. Subsequently, notice under Se...

ITA No. 526/2008 & 1299/2008: Appellant vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Depreciation on Bombay Stock Exchange Membership Ticket under Section 32(1)(ii) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant appealed against the denial of depreciation claims on the membership ticket of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The appellant sought to classify the BSE membership ticket as an intangib...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Akash Kumar Sharma – Delhi High Court, ITA No. 291/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The assessee, Akash Kumar Sharma, had filed his income tax returns for the relevant assessment year. The Income Tax Department issued notices under Sections 147 and 148 for reassessmen...

ACME Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – ITA 526/2008: Delhi High Court on Income Tax Assessment Dispute under Section 143(3) & Section 147

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, ACME Ltd., challenged the reassessment notice issued by the Income Tax Department under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reassessment arose due to alleged omission o...

ITO vs Akshat Kumar Sharma: Delhi High Court on Section 151(1) of Income Tax Act – Assessment Year 2010-11

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Income Tax Officer (ITO), challenged the assessment of Akshat Kumar Sharma under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-11. The dispute centered on the disallowance of ...