Facts of the
Case
The appeals before the Delhi High Court pertained to the same
assessee.
The combined tax effect of both appeals was less than ₹10 lakh.
The Revenue (Department of Income Tax) filed these ...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Shri Narender Anand, was required to file his income
tax return for the year ending 31.03.1988 by 31.07.1988.
The assessee applied on 29.07.1988 for an extension till
...
Facts of the Case
Omnibus
Challenge: The Income Tax Department filed a cluster
of writ petitions [WP (C) Nos. 1940, 1942, 1943, 1945, 1946, and 1948–1958
of 2011, which includes the subject matter i...
Facts of the
Case
The petitioner, Gurinder Singh Sikka, had filed three writ
petitions before the Delhi High Court (W.P.(C) Nos. 1057/2011, 1058/2011
& 1059/2011) against the Chief Commissioner of Inco...
Facts of the Case
Background
and Assignment: The assessee company, M/s Hydrocarbons
India Ltd., was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Oil and Natural Gas
Commission of India (ONGC). It was incorporated...
Facts of the
Case
Petitioner: Gurinder Singh Sikka filed writ petitions
challenging actions of the Income Tax Department.
Respondent: Chief Commissioner of Income Tax.
The petitions were initially filed but ...
Facts of the Case
The
Income Tax Department (the Petitioners) filed an omnibus challenge under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India against multiple orders passed by
the Board for Industrial &...
Facts of the
CasePetitioner Gurinder Singh Sikka filed writ
petitions before the High Court of Delhi challenging certain actions of the Chief
Commissioner of Income Tax. The petitioner, through his counsel Mr. K.R.
M...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, National Agricultural
Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd., an apex cooperative society
registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 1984, had been
granted de...
Facts
of the Case1.
The
Income Tax Department filed multiple writ petitions challenging various orders
passed by BIFR concerning sick industrial companies.2.  ...