Facts of the Case
The assessee, M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd., claimed various deductions
and allowances while computing its taxable income for Assessment Year
1984-85.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A
of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the Tribunal’s order regarding the assessment
year 2004-05. The assessee, M/s. Insilco Ltd., claimed bad de...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Halcrow Consulting India Pvt Ltd, filed
applications for a refund from the Income Tax authorities. Despite submitting
their representation, the petitioner’s requests had not been addr...
Facs of the Case
The assessee, M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd., was engaged in the business
of manufacturing and dealing in yarn.
During Assessment Year 1984-85, the assessee claimed deductions
relating to:
...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee, ECE Industries Limited, filed its income tax return
declaring a loss.
During
the assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 1999-2000, the Assessing...
Facts of the CaseThe appeals arise under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
regarding:
Deletion
of additions made by the Assessing Officer (A...
Facts of the
CaseThe dispute pertained to
Assessment Year 1983-84. The Revenue sought adjudication of six questions of
law arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).The issues included:1. ...
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Status: The appellant, M/S Lotus Trans Travels P.
Ltd., is a private limited company operating as an approved tour operator
under the Department of Tourism (the prescribed a...
Facts of the Case:The appeal concerns the deletion of certain additions made by
the Assessing Officer (AO) in the taxpayer's assessment. The AO had relied on
unproduced books of account and documents recovered during s...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed a batch of writ petitions under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of
Delhi. The challenge was directed against an order dated January 22, 2010...