The Commissioner of Income Tax-XIII vs. Sh. Qimat Rai Garg (ITA No. 759/2010, 2010:DHC:11695-DB) Validity of Chapter XIV-B Block Assessments: Whether Undisclosed Income Can Be Computed Based on Post-Search Bank Enquiries Traced to an Assessee's Statement on Oath Under Section 132(4) in Light of the Finance Act, 2002 Retrospective Amendments.

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee is a Chartered Accountant and a director in multiple finance and hire-purchase companies. Following a search operation conducted on a third-party corporate...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Xansa India Ltd. — Deletion of Rs. 2.26 Crore Addition Affirmed as Foreign Exchange Reimbursements Were Duly Supported by Agreements, Debit Notes, and FIRCs Submitted During Assessment Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 106
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 2.26 crores to the assessee's income. This addition was made by disallowing the sum claimed by the assessee as earnings in ...

M/s Great Eastern Exports v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Connected Appeals – Deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80IA/80IB Cannot Be Claimed on the Same Profits Twice | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 109
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSeveral appeals involving different assessees and the Revenue were heard together as they raised a common legal issue concerning deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act.The assessees had c...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Stellar Construction (P) Ltd. — Deletion of Section 68 Addition on Account of Share Application Money Where Identity and Capacity of Investors Stand Established and Confirmed via Prior Precedents

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to the total income of the assessee under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The addition was made on the grounds that the assessee failed...

Achin Agarwal, Pradeep Agarwal, and Geeta Agarwal vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. — Writ Jurisdiction Challenge Under Article 226 Against Section 127 Transfer of Assessment Files from Delhi to Rajasthan and Admissibility of Mutual Extension of Time for Completion of Income Tax Assessments Pursuant to High Court Directives

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe individual Petitioners (Achin Agarwal, Pradeep Agarwal, and Geeta Agarwal) approached the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi by filing three separate civil writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s John Tinson & Co. (P) Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 275(1)(a) & 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act – Limitation for Penalty Proceedings After Fresh Assessment Order

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s John Tinson & Co. (P) Ltd., filed its return for Assessment Year 1993-94 declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO), however, completed assessment under Section 143(3) and asses...

Pradeep Agarwal vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & AnR (With Achin Agarwal vs. CIT and Geeta Agarwal vs. CIT) | Scope of Section 127 Transfer and Specific Court-Ordered Extension for Completion of Assessment Under the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners (Achin Agarwal, Pradeep Agarwal, and Geeta Agarwal) filed three separate writ petitions before the High Court of Delhi. The initial grievance and prayer in these petitions sought a writ...

M/s Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax TDS & Ors. | High Court Direction to Decide Income Tax Refund Application and Allow Credit Adjustment Against Outstanding TDS Demand Notice

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 76
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee-petitioner, M/s Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the legal justifiability of an order dated December 3, 2010, passed by the Commissioner of Income ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. A.T. Invofin India (P) Ltd. & Connected Assessees | Section 158BB(1)(c), 158BC, 158BD & 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Belated Return Filed After Search Cannot Defeat Block Assessment of Undisclosed Income

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act was conducted on 13 January 2000 in the Shyam Telecom Group of Companies, to which the respondent companies belonged.Althoug...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Honda Trading Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. (ITA Nos. 1935, 1937 & 1938/2010) | Debatable Claim on Technical Know-How Fees Treated as Capital Expenditure Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee incurred certain expenses towards technical know-how fees and claimed the entire amount as allowable revenue expenditure during the assessment proceedings. ...