Facts of the Case
The
revenue department initiated reassessment proceedings against the
respondent/assessee by issuing notices under Section 148 of the
Income Tax Act.
These
reassessment noti...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, M/s Epicurean Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd.,
incurred expenditure amounting to ₹5,67,957/- on renovation and repair of
a kitchen operating from rented premises.
The exp...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High
Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 10 July 2009 for Assessme...
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department (Revenue) initiated reassessment
proceedings against the respondent/assessee. The Assessing Officer issued a
statutory notice for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income ...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee company was engaged in the business of real estate
development and transactions.
The original owner, Shri Baljeet Singh Malhotra, entered into a
collaboration agreement wit...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal dated 22 August 2008 pertaining to Assessment Year 2003-04.The Ass...
Facts of the Case
The assessee, Modi Industries Limited, claimed various deductions
and tax benefits under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Revenue disputed:
Non-applicability of Section 40A(5)(c) to salar...
Facts of the
Case
Engineers India Ltd. was assessed for Assessment Year 1996-97.
During the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer
issued notices and questionnaires under Section 142(1) of the ...
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department initiated reassessment proceedings
against the respondent-assessee. The Assessing Officer issued formal notices
for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Howev...
Facts of the
Case
The Assessing Officer had made various additions and disallowances
during the assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2003-04.
The assessee challenged the additions before the Commissioner...