Facts of the Case
Parties
involved: The Appellant is the Commissioner of Income
Tax (Revenue), and the Respondent is M/s. Shell Bitumen India (P) Ltd.
The
Dispute: The appeal arises under Section 2...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee is a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and
exporting readymade garments.
On
March 11, 2004, a survey operation under Section 133A was conducted at ...
Facts of the Case
The Commissioner of Income Tax preferred an appeal before the Delhi
High Court against GKN Driveline Ltd.
At the time of hearing, the Revenue acknowledged that the
controversy involved i...
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Profile: The respondent-assessee is a partnership
firm actively engaged in the manufacturing and export business of
readymade garments.
Survey
Operation: On March 1...
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant, the Commissioner of Income Tax, filed this
appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a previous
order passed on 23rd June, 2009 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...
Facts of the
Case
The Commissioner of Income Tax filed the present appeal before the
Delhi High Court against Micromatic Machine Pvt. Ltd.
At the time of hearing, counsel appearing for the Revenue
acknow...
Facts of the Case·
The Appellant (Revenue/Income Tax
Department) filed an appeal challenging the order dated August 21, 2009, passed
by the Income Tax Appellate Tribuna...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, IFCI Limited, had written off certain
investments in its books of account and claimed the resulting loss as a
deduction while computing its total income. During the assessment proceeding...
Facts of the Case·
Investment and
Registration: The respondent-assessee made
investments in properties located at Ground Floor, Bangla Sahib Road, New
Delhi, along wit...
Facts of the Case·
The Appellant, Power Finance Corporation Ltd. (a Public Sector
Undertaking), filed a series of Income Tax Appeals (ITA Nos. 1093/2010,
1095/2010, 109...