Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,239,844
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Vikram Krishnan vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 2(22)(e) Deemed Dividend on Shareholder Advances

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual deriving income from salary, house property, capital gains, and interest, was a director and 50% shareholder in a closely held company, M/s Charu Home Products (P) Ltd...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Nortel Networks Singapore Pte Ltd (2018) – Delhi High Court | Permanent Establishment & Royalty under India–Singapore DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 188
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A challenging orders in favour of the assessee, Nortel Networks Singapore Pte Ltd. The dispute involved cross-border transactions and applicability...

M/s. McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-6 (Delhi High Court) – ITAT Findings on KPO Classification Not Binding as Precedent

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 189
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, M/s. McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals against ITAT orders for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13. The ITAT had concluded that the assessee was engaged...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs Jindal Photo Ltd. (2018) – Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed Without Examining Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAs observed from the order (Page 1–2), the Revenue filed appeals (ITA 1337/2018, 1338/2018, 1341/2018) against the respondent assessee, Jindal Photo Ltd. During the hearing, it was submitted by the ...

M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Withdrawal of Petition with Liberty under Section 139(1) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 191
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Infonox Software Private Limited & Others, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging proceedings initiated by the Income Tax...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh vs Parabolic Drugs Ltd. (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Condonation of Delay Rejected due to Government Lethargy under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 192
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal against the ITAT order dated 17 June 2011 for AY 2006–07. There was a delay of 928 days in filing the appeal and 1656 days in re-filing the sam...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–5 vs Jindal Photo Ltd. (2018) – Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed Without Adjudication on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 155
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeals were filed by the Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–5) against Jindal Photo Ltd. The matter came before the Delhi High Court involving multiple Income Tax App...

M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Withdrawal of Criminal Petitions under Section 139(1) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 185
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court seeking relief against proceedings initiated by the Deputy ...

Surendra Kumar Jain vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Reassessment Without Disposal of Objections Held Invalid (Sections 147/148 Income Tax Act)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 185
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner’s assessment for AY 2011–12 was reopened by the Assessing Officer (AO). Reasons for reopening were provided to the petitioner. The petitioner filed obj...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs Jindal Photo Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed Without Adjudication on Merits [Sections 50, 51 & 54, Income Tax Act]

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 188
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5) filed multiple appeals against Jindal Photo Ltd. before the Delhi High Court. During the hearing, it was submitted by the Revenue that the tax effec...