Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,240,291
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Shri Rajiv Dass vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 54B Exemption Denied on Failure to Prove Agricultural Use of Land

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 198
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Rajiv Dass, sold land situated in Ghaziabad for ₹6.51 crores, which had been purchased earlier for ₹58.90 lakhs. The assessee claimed exemption under Section 54B on capital...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–3 vs DLF Home Developers Ltd. (2018) – Section 14A Disallowance & Rule 8D Applicability | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 176
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Year 2011–12.The case involved two major issues: Golf Club Mem...

JC Bamford Excavators Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Director of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Appeals Withdrawn Pursuant to Settlement under Indo-UK Mutual Assistance Treaty

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 211
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellants, including JC Bamford Excavators Ltd. and JC Bamford Investments Ltd., had filed multiple income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging actions/orders of the Income Tax Depa...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs Jagson International Ltd (2018) – Delhi High Court | Section 14A & Rule 8D Disallowance | Drilling Rig as Qualifying Ship u/s 115VD

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 215
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 11 May 2018 concerning Assessment Years...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 vs Vedanta Limited – Section 14A r/w Rule 8D Not Automatic Without AO Satisfaction (Delhi HC

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 214
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Vedanta Limited, earned dividend income of ₹8.97 crores, which was exempt under Section 10(34) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee voluntarily disallowed ₹9,07,453 un...

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs M/s Elofic Industries Ltd (Delhi High Court) – Royalty as Revenue Expenditure & Deletion of Unverified Purchases Addition under Sections 147, 148, 133(6), 260A of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 230
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2004-05. The assessee had ori...

Granite Gate Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Timing of Expense Allowability under PoC Method

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 226
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a real estate developer, was engaged in construction of housing projects “Lotus Boulevard” and “Lotus Panache.” It followed the Percentage of Completion Method (PoC Method) ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax–5 vs Jagson International Ltd | Section 14A & Rule 8D Disallowance | Drilling Rig as Qualifying Ship u/s 115VD | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 193
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Years 2009–10 and 2010–11. Two primary issues arose: Whether a drilling ...

PR Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs Nucleus Steel Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Section 68 Addition on Genuineness of Transaction Despite Proven Identity and Creditworthiness

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 195
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged the order concerning receipt of ₹67.50 crores by the respondent-assessee from M/s Unitech Limited. The Revenue did not dispute: Identity of the payer Creditwor...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Section 115JB | Provision for Gratuity & Leave Encashment | Sales Promotion Expenses

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 188
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10.The primary dispute related to: Addition of provisions for gratuity and leave encashment...