Shashi Vaish vs. DCIT (ITAT Allahabad): Addition for Alleged Bogus Capital Gain from Penny Stock Deleted — Conditions of Section 68 Not Satisfied

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 93
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee declared Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) arising from the sale of listed equity shares and claimed exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The shares were stated to have ...

Umesh Kumar Sindhi vs CIT (Central), Allahabad — ITAT Allahabad on Revision u/s 263: Scope of Commissioner’s Powers in Search/Assessment Cases

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 460
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s case was assessed by the Assessing Officer, who passed an assessment order after examining the relevant material and details furnished.Subsequently, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Ce...

Shri Rama Pati Gupta vs ITO, Pratapgarh — ITAT Allahabad on Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits u/s 68/69A and Burden of Proof on Assessee

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer observed substantial cash deposits in the assessee’s bank account. The assessee was required to explain the source of these deposits.Not being satisf...

Shri Ram Kishan Sewa Kendra, Mahoba vs ITO, Banda — ITAT Allahabad on Additions for Unexplained Income/Cash Credits and Assessment Validity

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the financial records of the assessee, Shri Ram Kishan Sewa Kendra. Certain transactions, including cash deposits and credits, were considered inadequately...

Rajesh Bajaj vs DCIT Circle-1, Allahabad — ITAT Allahabad on Additions for Unexplained Income/Cash Credits and Evidentiary Burden under Sections 68/69

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 117
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the financial records and bank transactions of the assessee, Rajesh Bajaj. Certain deposits and credits were considered not satisfactorily...

Prahalad Prasad Gupta vs ITO, Maharajganj (ITAT Allahabad) — Disallowance of Godown Rent & Business Expenses Despite Audited Books u/s 44AB | AY 2014-15

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Gorakhpur for Assessment Year 2014-15. The dispute primarily related to disallowance of godown rent paid for ...

Anil Kumar, Allahabad vs ITO, Allahabad — ITAT Allahabad on Additions for Unexplained Cash Deposits/Income and Evidentiary Burden under the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 112
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed substantial cash deposits and financial transactions in the assessee’s bank account. The assessee was called upon to explain the nature an...

Algoo Singh vs JCIT, Range-III, Mirzapur (ITAT Allahabad) — Legality of Assessment and Additions by Joint Commissioner | Scope of Powers & Validity of Proceedings under the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee challenged the assessment order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-III, Mirzapur for the relevant assessment year. The dispute pertained to additions made in the assessm...

Sanjeev Upadhyay vs. Income Tax Officer — ITAT Allahabad on Addition for Unexplained Income/Bank Deposits and Burden of Proof under Sections 69/69A & 143(3) of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 338
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Sanjeev Upadhyay, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench, challenging the order passed by the lower authorities concerning additions made t...

Rajendra Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer — ITAT Allahabad on Ex-Parte Order by CIT(A), Violation of Natural Justice & Mandatory Speaking Order under Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 118
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench, challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. The original assessment...